Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

8
SCOTUS VOTED 5 to 4 on the Brunson Brothers case. (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 94 days ago by WRetardsG1WAutistG2 94 days ago by WRetardsG1WAutistG2 +8 / -0
12 comments download share
12 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
▲ 17 ▼
– TNBanjoMan 17 points 94 days ago +17 / -0

Can we all just start spelling it right? Martial Law.... not Marshall Law.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MAGA_Patriot_1776 4 points 94 days ago +4 / -0

TLDR: All Brunson Brothers cases have been fully resolved and closed at every level of the federal judiciary, with no pending appeals or petitions. SCOTUS denied certiorari and rehearings in all instances, effectively ending the litigation.

The Brunson Brothers cases refer to a series of related lawsuits filed by brothers Raland J. Brunson, Loy Arlan Brunson, and others (including Deron and Gaynor Brunson in supporting roles). These pro se actions stemmed from allegations surrounding the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The core claim was that over 380 members of Congress (along with President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and former Vice President Mike Pence) violated their oaths of office under the U.S. Constitution by certifying the electoral votes on January 6, 2021, without first investigating claims of election interference and fraud. The lawsuits sought the removal of these officials from office, arguing that their actions constituted acts of war against the Constitution and treason.

The cases originated in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah and were dismissed there on grounds including lack of standing, sovereign immunity, and failure to state a claim. These dismissals were affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in unpublished opinions. The Brunsons then petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) for writs of certiorari in multiple iterations, all of which were denied without oral argument or detailed explanation, as is common for the vast majority of cert petitions. A subsequent lawsuit targeted three SCOTUS justices themselves for allegedly breaching their oaths by denying an earlier petition, but this was also dismissed at lower levels and denied cert by SCOTUS.

Below is a chronological breakdown of the key cases, based on official dockets and court records:

Initial Lawsuits and Lower Court Proceedings (2021–2022)

  • The first suit, filed by Loy Brunson on July 16, 2021 (later consolidated or paralleled with similar filings by Raland), accused 388 defendants (primarily lawmakers) of oath violations for not probing election irregularities before certification. A magistrate judge recommended dismissal, which was adopted by the district court on November 18, 2021. The Tenth Circuit affirmed on October 6, 2022.

SCOTUS Petition: Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al. (Docket No. 22-380)

  • Petition filed October 20, 2022; docketed October 24, 2022.
  • Respondents (including the U.S. government) waived response on November 23, 2022.
  • Distributed for conference on November 30, 2022.
  • Several amicus briefs were submitted but rejected as untimely (e.g., from Paul Preston & New California State on December 28–31, 2022).
  • Petition denied January 9, 2023.
  • Rehearing petition filed January 23, 2023; distributed February 1, 2023; denied February 21, 2023.
  • Status: Closed; no further action possible at SCOTUS.

SCOTUS Petition: Loy Arlan Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al. (Docket No. 22-1028)

  • This was a near-identical suit to the prior one, filed as a Rule 11 petition (seeking review before final Tenth Circuit judgment) on April 19, 2023; docketed April 24, 2023.
  • Amicus brief from Paul Preston et al. filed May 11, 2023 (after an initial rejection).
  • Respondents waived response May 24, 2023.
  • Distributed for conference June 6, 2023.
  • Petition denied June 26, 2023.
  • Rehearing petition filed July 7, 2023; distributed July 27, 2023; denied August 21, 2023.
  • Status: Closed; no further action possible at SCOTUS.

Follow-Up Lawsuit and SCOTUS Petition: Raland J. Brunson v. Sonia Sotomayor et al. (Docket No. 23-1073)

  • This suit targeted Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson (in their official capacities) for allegedly violating their oaths by voting to deny rehearing in the prior case (22-380). It claimed this was treason and sought their removal.
  • Dismissed by the Tenth Circuit on February 9, 2024.
  • Petition for cert filed March 29, 2024; docketed April 2, 2024.
  • Respondents waived response May 2, 2024.
  • Distributed for conference May 7, 2024.
  • Petition denied May 28, 2024 (with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson recusing themselves under 28 U.S.C. §455 and the Code of Conduct for Justices).
  • Rehearing petition filed June 12, 2024; distributed June 27, 2024; denied July 22, 2024 (recusals again applied).
  • Status: Closed; no further action possible at SCOTUS.

Overall Current Status (as of March 5, 2026)

All Brunson Brothers cases have been fully resolved and closed at every level of the federal judiciary, with no pending appeals or petitions. SCOTUS denied certiorari and rehearings in all instances, effectively ending the litigation. No new filings or developments have occurred since the July 2024 denial in 23-1073, and the brothers have stated they may pursue advocacy outside the courts but have not initiated further legal actions. The cases garnered attention among election skeptics but were widely criticized by legal experts as frivolous and lacking merit, with no evidence of traction in the courts.

Sauce: Grok.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– GGRockz 4 points 94 days ago +4 / -0

Yes.

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 5 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy