I mean yes. In theory the Pentagon could be ordering to hide casualty figures. But you run into the problem of it’ll be kinda difficult to disguise the facility processing a large volume of wounded. Especially as the facility is so small. Aside from the fact it’s in the middle of a base and routinely deals with Medical concerns of civilians on base. Not to mention soldiers and their families.

Large volumes of wounded be processed treated and transferred would stand out and get noticed. Enlisted Soldiers talk. As do civilians. The Ambulances shuttling back and forth. Aircraft touching down and lifting off. If not in the base then around it as German Civilians notice an uptick in the number of arriving aircraft. Someone would be posting on social media. Information blackout or not. And since the media is the media and they hate the man in office. They would most certainly run with it.

It’s more likely conspiracy influencers being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian. Most of them have built their brands off of negativity, righteous Anger, and Outrage. It sells their merch and drives clicks.

This is especially lucrative in this instance since 1. The Israelis are involved in the campaign and nothing sets Anons off like the Israelis being involved in anything. Knee-jerk ‘the Jews’ emotional reaction.

And 2. Many of the big Conspiracy Talking Heads all universally adopted the same talking points with no real variation about the air campaign. Which suggests someone is actively trying to manipulate people and set a narrative. Which likely means money is changing hands behind the scenes.

3. A significant number of people. Anons included don’t think extensively past the surface level logic of a claim. Especially when it comes to emotionally charged topics. It’s a tactic MSM used to great effect. Anons prove susceptible to it because of a general idea growing more pervasive is that non-msm source= somehow inherently more truthful. Or claim ignored by Mainstream media=something they don’t want us to know. So therefore it must be true. A sort of reverse confirmation bias. Getting especially dangerous with the rise of AI as now suddenly there is ‘Proof’ of whatever claim.