Current NVRA allows for mail-in voter registration which relies on self-attestation of Citizenship. This will be changed to requireing specific documents to be submitted in-person.
Current NVRA actually prohibits the states from mandating documentary proof for citizenship during voter registration. Save Act does the opposite.
Currently, 6 states are exempt from NVRA. These states will be covered by the new Act.
Mailin ballots dont have ID safeguards. Save Act fixes that.
There are also safeguards in people being able to sue their local governments to ensure these safeguards
I am kind of curious what makes you concerned about Save Act, or which sources informed you that there are no loopholes to be fixed? We have all seen what has happened over the past 8 years and I find it very strange that there are a few patriots who do not think Save Act is necessary or important.
I'm not concerned about it in itself. I am concerned it wont be passed in time to do any safeguarding. I have no information on loopholes and it was a question. I have seen several people throw out random bits so I ask about what it is. You came back and provided some of the rules which gives me a place to read up more. Thank you.
The self attestation is breaking the law if you lie tho right?
The self attestation is breaking the law if you lie tho right?
Yes it is, and this is why the Dems push the talking point that its already addressed in the current laws, but the deception will only be obvious once you break it down:
Lets say millions self attest that they are citizens when they are not. They have now committed perjury
NVRA prohibits asking for documents to verify this. So there is no way within NVRA to establish that these people have broken the law
Currently no effective way to stop this abuse. Yes, if you catch these people and prove that they lied, you can send them to prisons, but there is no easy mechanism for that to happen.
THIS is how this particular loophole works.
SAVE Act closes this loophole by making sure that we disallow people from committing perjury in the first place.
And this is the typical mode of operation where bills are formulated specifically in a way that allows them to push talking points that the issues are already addressed in existing laws, when the existing laws do the exact opposite.
These things are quite common sense really, but I never get tired of explaining basic common sense to people who are either too lazy to care about things, or too stupid to just believe whatever is told to them by their fav media, even with so much unfolding in front of us.
Oh, and of course there are those who pretend not to understand because they are shills. I don't get tired of explaining it to them as well, because their reactions are always quite revealing.
You need not pay taxes . But it should be a PART of what qualifies your vote -should be whether you choose to file or not. Technically even if you don't owe - filing is a requirement
Not an exhaustive list:
Current NVRA allows for mail-in voter registration which relies on self-attestation of Citizenship. This will be changed to requireing specific documents to be submitted in-person.
Current NVRA actually prohibits the states from mandating documentary proof for citizenship during voter registration. Save Act does the opposite.
Currently, 6 states are exempt from NVRA. These states will be covered by the new Act.
Mailin ballots dont have ID safeguards. Save Act fixes that.
There are also safeguards in people being able to sue their local governments to ensure these safeguards
I am kind of curious what makes you concerned about Save Act, or which sources informed you that there are no loopholes to be fixed? We have all seen what has happened over the past 8 years and I find it very strange that there are a few patriots who do not think Save Act is necessary or important.
I'm not concerned about it in itself. I am concerned it wont be passed in time to do any safeguarding. I have no information on loopholes and it was a question. I have seen several people throw out random bits so I ask about what it is. You came back and provided some of the rules which gives me a place to read up more. Thank you.
The self attestation is breaking the law if you lie tho right?
Yes it is, and this is why the Dems push the talking point that its already addressed in the current laws, but the deception will only be obvious once you break it down:
Lets say millions self attest that they are citizens when they are not. They have now committed perjury
NVRA prohibits asking for documents to verify this. So there is no way within NVRA to establish that these people have broken the law
Currently no effective way to stop this abuse. Yes, if you catch these people and prove that they lied, you can send them to prisons, but there is no easy mechanism for that to happen.
THIS is how this particular loophole works.
SAVE Act closes this loophole by making sure that we disallow people from committing perjury in the first place.
And this is the typical mode of operation where bills are formulated specifically in a way that allows them to push talking points that the issues are already addressed in existing laws, when the existing laws do the exact opposite.
These things are quite common sense really, but I never get tired of explaining basic common sense to people who are either too lazy to care about things, or too stupid to just believe whatever is told to them by their fav media, even with so much unfolding in front of us.
Oh, and of course there are those who pretend not to understand because they are shills. I don't get tired of explaining it to them as well, because their reactions are always quite revealing.
Should specific that to get a voter ID in a state requires that you file an annual tax in that state. Skin in the game and all that.
We dont have vote based on how productive you are.
You need not pay taxes . But it should be a PART of what qualifies your vote -should be whether you choose to file or not. Technically even if you don't owe - filing is a requirement