I don’t hate jews or kushner. They’re not worth hating. I’m just not going to tolerate attacks on Christianity.
Again with a goofy analogy. Stating a fact of a direct link is not the same thing as falsely captioning a photograph. The first is honest even if you find it distasteful, while the second is dishonest.
You can make a case that the selective mention of the direct link was done for ulterior motives, but as long as the direct link is true you can’t accuse it of being dishonest. All you’re left with is speculation of motive. That’s your right to speculate, but it might not be convincing to others and it might make you seem like a whiny bitch.
Speaking of a whiny bitch, the snitching part is funny.
So when you targeted me for harassment in a random thread I didn't even read or participate in with“
If you didn’t read the thread then it would’ve been impossible for you to be harassed by it. Now you’re claiming that you stalked my earlier comments in search of something to be retroactively offended by.
The ((( ))) was actually a compliment? You're full of shit.“
The parentheses are neither a compliment or an insult. They’re a neutral identifier. To feel insulted by being identified as a jew says something about the pearl-clutcher.
You’ve set up a false binary, as there are plenty of middle ground options between hating and complimenting someone. For a moment I’ll play your false binary game with some sincere compliments. I have admired the work of some jewish physicists, economists, musicians, and movie directors. So now I’m a complimenting “1” in your binary rather than a hateful “0”. Would my compliment become an insult with some added identifying punctuation, like this?: I have admired the work of some jewish physicists (((Einstein, Feynman))), economists (((von Mises, Rothbard, Friedman))) musicians (((Weinrib, Knofler, Fishman, Gordon, Freeman))), and movie directors (((Kubrick, Friedkin, Mann))).
Last week in another thread you were caught lying about someone else’s use of the term “Israel” and were called out by multiple people whom you didn’t downvote except for me, because you’re bigoted against me. Anytime you downvote a truthful comment because you’re bigoted against the commenter, or because the truth is unflattering to your ego, you are attacking the truth, which is a satanic thing to do. You are perpetuating the claim that jews are really satanic, which is an inconsiderate thing for you to do to decent jews.
You got caught lying that a person creating an internet post about a stranger would create a direct link between the two people. You got caught lying that the mention of a truly existing direct link is the same as a false caption under a photograph. You reacted to being corrected with spite, ingratitude, and libel. You lied that I hate people, that I want someone to be treated unfairly, and that I’m full of shit.
you've violated forum rules.“
After your frustration of not being able to win a debate, to avoid writing mistruths, or to avoid dishonorably downvoting the truth, in your desperation you became a hall monitor, focused on clown world technicalities instead of debate substance. Your dishonor is unfair to jews who would rather not be associated with it.
I don’t hate jews or kushner. They’re not worth hating. I’m just not going to tolerate attacks on Christianity.
Again with a goofy analogy. Stating a fact of a direct link is not the same thing as falsely captioning a photograph. The first is honest even if you find it distasteful, while the second is dishonest.
You can make a case that the selective mention of the direct link was done for ulterior motives, but as long as the direct link is true you can’t accuse it of being dishonest. All you’re left with is speculation of motive. That’s your right to speculate, but it might not be convincing to others and it might make you seem like a whiny bitch.
Speaking of a whiny bitch, the snitching part is funny.
So when you targeted me for harassment in a random thread I didn't even read or participate in with
The ((( ))) was actually a compliment? You're full of shit.
For you to call it a snitch would be an admission you're aware you've violated forum rules.
If you didn’t read the thread then it would’ve been impossible for you to be harassed by it. Now you’re claiming that you stalked my earlier comments in search of something to be retroactively offended by.
The parentheses are neither a compliment or an insult. They’re a neutral identifier. To feel insulted by being identified as a jew says something about the pearl-clutcher.
You’ve set up a false binary, as there are plenty of middle ground options between hating and complimenting someone. For a moment I’ll play your false binary game with some sincere compliments. I have admired the work of some jewish physicists, economists, musicians, and movie directors. So now I’m a complimenting “1” in your binary rather than a hateful “0”. Would my compliment become an insult with some added identifying punctuation, like this?: I have admired the work of some jewish physicists (((Einstein, Feynman))), economists (((von Mises, Rothbard, Friedman))) musicians (((Weinrib, Knofler, Fishman, Gordon, Freeman))), and movie directors (((Kubrick, Friedkin, Mann))).
Last week in another thread you were caught lying about someone else’s use of the term “Israel” and were called out by multiple people whom you didn’t downvote except for me, because you’re bigoted against me. Anytime you downvote a truthful comment because you’re bigoted against the commenter, or because the truth is unflattering to your ego, you are attacking the truth, which is a satanic thing to do. You are perpetuating the claim that jews are really satanic, which is an inconsiderate thing for you to do to decent jews.
You got caught lying that a person creating an internet post about a stranger would create a direct link between the two people. You got caught lying that the mention of a truly existing direct link is the same as a false caption under a photograph. You reacted to being corrected with spite, ingratitude, and libel. You lied that I hate people, that I want someone to be treated unfairly, and that I’m full of shit.
After your frustration of not being able to win a debate, to avoid writing mistruths, or to avoid dishonorably downvoting the truth, in your desperation you became a hall monitor, focused on clown world technicalities instead of debate substance. Your dishonor is unfair to jews who would rather not be associated with it.