28 9th Circuit Court, Judge Van Dyke writing lead dissent. Opening sentence: “This is a case about swinging dicks.” This is not satire! (reason.com) posted 83 days ago by BerlinWallCrosser 83 days ago by BerlinWallCrosser +28 / -0 Judge VanDyke: "This is a case about swinging dicks." 30 members of the Ninth Circuit write to disagree. 4 comments share 4 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Wow.
There needs to be protestors with signs that read “NO SWINGING DICKS IN WOMEN ONLY SPAS” standing out in front of the 9th Circus Court.
The judges who agree to allow swinging dicks in an all female spa are an ABOMINATION to the law, and they should all be impeached.
It is insane to say it’s OK for a perverted man who claims to be a woman to be given access to the spa.
The real men in the area should stand watch outside the spa and bar the pervert’s access.
Thanks for posting this one. Worth a read, just to see the level of insanity being enforced.
These people need to go back to first principles and ask the question: "Why were there ever two separated categories of spas, toilets or sports in the first place?"
If everyone is the same then why not just have one class of everything?
Make it a spa for humans with natural vaginas, not a woman's only spa.