Did you know that basically it says ignore laws that don't follow real Laws, you can ignore them.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
If only more than 4 SC justices believed in the Constitution.
Aye, the sticking point.
Precedent enters the conversation. Those are the bricks that built the lawfare wall.
I once did a paper which explored how Brown vs. Board of Ed transfigured law into the illogical Swann busing decision. Precedents. Producing decisions based on a previous decision instead of the Constitution.
Yeah i hate precedence.
Yeah, precedent drives me crazy. Supposedly it's for 'consistency' so that the people are confident in the legal system. I'd be more confident if judges thought for themselves and referred to the constitution rather than some other guys previous opinion.