you literally do not understand the concept of “UP” and “DOWN”
i mean, you think you understand, when you are walking on flat earth…
but as soon as we talk about going to the moon, then suddenly your brain switches into science fiction mode
where “UP” suddenly becomes this abstract concept that doesn’t really exist in outer space
never mind that we arent talking about outer space
we are talking about the “space” between the earth and the moon
which absolutely has “UP” and “DOWN”
along a gradient,
peaking at a Lagrange Point
essentially, an astronaut MUST go UP and AWAY from the center of Earths mass,
for over 100,000 miles…
straight UP
“oh but the force of gravity diminishes over distance”
~ said the EE who doesn’t actually understand maxwells equations
“oh but the inverse square law”
~ said gravity
So how does a rocket goes straight up for 100,000 miles?
easy!
you use the slingshot effect,
and gravity assist,
and you fly your rocket really fast
so fast that you acKtually achieve
“escape velocity”
and then you “escape gravity”
and kinda slide sideways thru the “flat space”
like a hockey puch on fresh ice… 😂
all the way from the earth to the moon,
flat space… that place where gravity magically ceases to exist, just because you get your rocket going sooOOOOOOoooooo fast
flat space!
even more absurd than flat earth?
a rocket can’t “escape gravity”
any more than a bird can “escape gravity”
“what goes up, must come down” ~ unknown
sorry, but this is ALL science fiction
the slingshot effect?
“gravity assist”
the rocket equation
escape velocity
ALL of this moon landing science originates in the realm of science fiction
drill down into the history of these concepts, and you will find a creative science fiction writer…
so some clever writers write some science fiction, and others take those stories and develop them into intricate storylines, hire actors, make movies…
like santa claus and flying reindeer and …
the entire moon landing story was made in hollywood
by stanley kubrick
not only do we know that Kubrick filmed it,
we know HOW kubrick filmed it
here is the absolute BEST evidence that the moon landing was faked
its a NASA video,
posted by Smithsonian
its 37 seconds long
and its of the lunar lander “launching” off of the moon…
and the special effects are so horrible,
they will make you lol
slow the video down and watch moment of launch
confetti comes out of the rocket 😂
and the reason that you’ve never seen this video before, is because it’s so horrible that it actually causes people to question the rest of moon landing 🤔
I'm not a genius, I'm actually pretty dumb. But lucky for me other smart people have already figured this out. https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (Chapter 2)
This is aKtually a well known, well understood phenomenon in photography - what you're seeing is chromatic aberration which is worsened by converting an SSTV signal to NTSC. This is photography 101 stuff.
Edit: I was sortof wrong with my initial response. While true it is a type of chromatic abberation, it was not due to the lens used, but due to the fact that they used a color wheel to simulate color broadcast in SSTV within the bandwidth of a B/W TV signal. Check out the video, they explain it much better than I can https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (10:00 timestamp)
and the reason that you’ve never seen this video before, is because it’s so horrible that it actually causes people to question the rest of moon landing 🤔
I have seen this video since I was a kid, it's been out there since it was published like 50 years ago
Like I said, does this prove or disprove? No. But I used to believe it was real, then I believed it was fake, now I KNOW it was at least plausible. Nobody knows, except the astronauts.
Here's another thing - I never believed that vaxxes caused SIDS, I thought that was crazy talk. I 100% do now, and for the last several years, even seeing evidence of it in my own friends' families.
When I was a kid I believed the moon missions were real. Then I saw Bart Sibrel, and for years and years, I believed the moon missions were faked. I BELIEVED it was fake. And then in the last few years I found out that Bart is a complete idiot, almost everything he says is demonstrably false, and the things he points out are actually easy to understand and prove. Does it mean we really went to the moon? Of course not, only the astronauts know that (of which, I think we're down to the last two or three of them, not sure.) So yea, I changed my mind on this very topic, TWICE. Not trying to fight about this, either. Just making conversation. This topic is banned btw, so we're probably getting a vacation soon.
you literally do not understand the concept of “UP” and “DOWN”
i mean, you think you understand, when you are walking on flat earth…
but as soon as we talk about going to the moon, then suddenly your brain switches into science fiction mode
where “UP” suddenly becomes this abstract concept that doesn’t really exist in outer space
never mind that we arent talking about outer space
we are talking about the “space” between the earth and the moon
which absolutely has “UP” and “DOWN”
along a gradient,
peaking at a Lagrange Point
essentially, an astronaut MUST go UP and AWAY from the center of Earths mass,
for over 100,000 miles…
straight UP
“oh but the force of gravity diminishes over distance”
~ said the EE who doesn’t actually understand maxwells equations
“oh but the inverse square law”
~ said gravity
So how does a rocket goes straight up for 100,000 miles?
easy!
you use the slingshot effect,
and gravity assist,
and you fly your rocket really fast
so fast that you acKtually achieve “escape velocity”
and then you “escape gravity”
and kinda slide sideways thru the “flat space”
like a hockey puch on fresh ice… 😂
all the way from the earth to the moon,
flat space… that place where gravity magically ceases to exist, just because you get your rocket going sooOOOOOOoooooo fast
flat space!
even more absurd than flat earth?
a rocket can’t “escape gravity” any more than a bird can “escape gravity”
“what goes up, must come down” ~ unknown
sorry, but this is ALL science fiction
the slingshot effect?
“gravity assist”
the rocket equation
escape velocity
ALL of this moon landing science originates in the realm of science fiction
drill down into the history of these concepts, and you will find a creative science fiction writer…
so some clever writers write some science fiction, and others take those stories and develop them into intricate storylines, hire actors, make movies…
like santa claus and flying reindeer and …
the entire moon landing story was made in hollywood
by stanley kubrick
not only do we know that Kubrick filmed it,
we know HOW kubrick filmed it
here is the absolute BEST evidence that the moon landing was faked
its a NASA video,
posted by Smithsonian
its 37 seconds long
and its of the lunar lander “launching” off of the moon…
and the special effects are so horrible, they will make you lol
slow the video down and watch moment of launch
confetti comes out of the rocket 😂
and the reason that you’ve never seen this video before, is because it’s so horrible that it actually causes people to question the rest of moon landing 🤔
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
its the mother of all red pills
you are watching a movie
and if you actually understood science, as well as you assume you understand science…
and science fiction,
you’d already know this by now…
i’m not sure where you think you are shipping parts,
but i assure you they will never land on the moon,
or mars
😂 ….
If it's fake, why did they take 6 missions to get this shot right? If it's CGI, why not just nail the shot on the first mission?
theres literally confetti coming out of the lander.
slow the video down to slo-mo,
and keep inspecting it over and over until you finally figure it out… its only 37 seconds long
its childs play to a genius like you
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
I'm not a genius, I'm actually pretty dumb. But lucky for me other smart people have already figured this out. https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (Chapter 2)
This is aKtually a well known, well understood phenomenon in photography - what you're seeing is chromatic aberration which is worsened by converting an SSTV signal to NTSC. This is photography 101 stuff.
Edit: I was sortof wrong with my initial response. While true it is a type of chromatic abberation, it was not due to the lens used, but due to the fact that they used a color wheel to simulate color broadcast in SSTV within the bandwidth of a B/W TV signal. Check out the video, they explain it much better than I can https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (10:00 timestamp)
cool story bro,
so you should have no problem providing a credible example of this phenomenon happening elsewhere, if its so well known and well understood
https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (chapter 2, timestamp 10:00, explained in full) the video link even ends with qQ
I have seen this video since I was a kid, it's been out there since it was published like 50 years ago
50 years ago you watched it on a grainy, low-def black and white TV with rabbit ears,
for about 37 seconds,
not giving you enough time to re-wind and scrutinize it frame by frame, like i did…
but now that its on YouTube, its just a video, and YouTube videos aren’t evidence of anything… right?
so wheres “the evidence” now?
did u watch it? or gonna pretend like it doesn't exist
Watch this. https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (Go to chapter 2)
Timestamp 10:00 for the exact section that addresses the "confetti explosion"
I guess we'll know within the next couple years, right?
the difference between you and me is, that we used to believe in the exact same bullshit,
but one of us changed their mind…
because they have the ability to change their mind…
whereas the other person has a fixed ideas that are impervious to new facts
can you give us one single example of a time when new evidence changed your opinion on the moon landing?
Here's a couple more links,
Danny Jones x Bart Sibrel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58YGzlW3Koc
Danny Jones x Everyday Astronaut https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7gFk_By5wU
Like I said, does this prove or disprove? No. But I used to believe it was real, then I believed it was fake, now I KNOW it was at least plausible. Nobody knows, except the astronauts.
Here's another thing - I never believed that vaxxes caused SIDS, I thought that was crazy talk. I 100% do now, and for the last several years, even seeing evidence of it in my own friends' families.
When I was a kid I believed the moon missions were real. Then I saw Bart Sibrel, and for years and years, I believed the moon missions were faked. I BELIEVED it was fake. And then in the last few years I found out that Bart is a complete idiot, almost everything he says is demonstrably false, and the things he points out are actually easy to understand and prove. Does it mean we really went to the moon? Of course not, only the astronauts know that (of which, I think we're down to the last two or three of them, not sure.) So yea, I changed my mind on this very topic, TWICE. Not trying to fight about this, either. Just making conversation. This topic is banned btw, so we're probably getting a vacation soon.
Watch this video with an open mind, and see what you think. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMHLvoWZfqQ