I wonder how we deal with them being here at this point.
It took me a long time to square them with religious freedom, but Islam is political, and so is Christianity in some regards (and government is, also of some necessity, somewhat religious - not through rite, but through being bound to morality … and, in some cases, having decided to compete with God for power).
Now we have to deal with property rights with them, as we know that even if they’re denied access to power, they will breed, lie, and cheat their way into it.
All while still attempting to minister to them…. and knowing that by whatever measure we judge, we shall be judged.
The balancing acts we have to look at these days are so nutty.
I have reports from fairly rural people that there are hijab wearing Muslims buying countryside properties.
“Nipping it in the bud” may have to include “denying them property rights”, which would be a higher level of mobilization and legislative considerations than accusing complicity of treason at a school board meeting.
This is what I’m getting at that it’s complicated, legally…. so long as they’re considered citizens, they’ll happily just try to breed us out.
Freedom of religion is codified in the 1st Amendment, you obviously know that.
HOWEVER, any organization can be prosecuted under RICO if they are conducting those types of organized criminal activities.
This is NO different than saying you can't be prosecuted for shooting someone because the 2nd Amendment allows you to own a gun. You go shoot someone and you will be prosecuted.
Yeah, I got confused for a bit with “separation of church and state”. Whoops.
That said, there should definitely be some sort of line on it. Cannibalism is a religion, but we don’t allow that free practice. Islam would seek to overturn the constitution. That’s a problem. “The People” never had a say in the communist plot to overrun us with anathematic foreigners, which also complicates things a bit.
Maybe on that last point, the purpose is for us to step up our domestic evangelism game….
I wonder how we deal with them being here at this point.
It took me a long time to square them with religious freedom, but Islam is political, and so is Christianity in some regards (and government is, also of some necessity, somewhat religious - not through rite, but through being bound to morality … and, in some cases, having decided to compete with God for power).
Now we have to deal with property rights with them, as we know that even if they’re denied access to power, they will breed, lie, and cheat their way into it.
All while still attempting to minister to them…. and knowing that by whatever measure we judge, we shall be judged.
The balancing acts we have to look at these days are so nutty.
There MUST BE NO LAWS EXCEPT OUR CONSTITUTION
No doubt, I mean “so how do we deal with them inside that framework without overturning the framework itself”.
Has seemed real tricky.
Can’t leave them alone either, or they’ll eventually show their card that they could not care less about the constitution and overturn it.
I guess it must begin in our local communities like the example in this post...only it should never get that far...nip it in the bud!
Yeah…
I have reports from fairly rural people that there are hijab wearing Muslims buying countryside properties.
“Nipping it in the bud” may have to include “denying them property rights”, which would be a higher level of mobilization and legislative considerations than accusing complicity of treason at a school board meeting.
This is what I’m getting at that it’s complicated, legally…. so long as they’re considered citizens, they’ll happily just try to breed us out.
<Spain is on Line 3>
How to eliminate Islam from America w/o violating the Constitution?
RICO investigations and prosecutions. Then do RICO investigations and prosecutions on Scientology.
Mmm could be. That’d be nice. I don’t know if removing them could be done by us, though.
Christians are called to obey the government as long as the government does not tell them to disobey God.
Islam tells Muslims to replace the government with Sharia law, period.
Christianity prohibits conversion by conquest.
Islam demands it.
Islam demands lying to the "infidel" (taqiyya)
In Christianity, the enemy of the wold is the father of lies.
Yeah, that “freedom of religion” clause in the Constitution that doesn’t exist is powerful brainwashing.
Freedom of religion is codified in the 1st Amendment, you obviously know that.
HOWEVER, any organization can be prosecuted under RICO if they are conducting those types of organized criminal activities.
This is NO different than saying you can't be prosecuted for shooting someone because the 2nd Amendment allows you to own a gun. You go shoot someone and you will be prosecuted.
Yeah, I got confused for a bit with “separation of church and state”. Whoops.
That said, there should definitely be some sort of line on it. Cannibalism is a religion, but we don’t allow that free practice. Islam would seek to overturn the constitution. That’s a problem. “The People” never had a say in the communist plot to overrun us with anathematic foreigners, which also complicates things a bit.
Maybe on that last point, the purpose is for us to step up our domestic evangelism game….