This video is thoroughly sound IMO. It explains in detail exactly how you take control of the cabal colour revolutions and redirect them to white hat outcomes.
I think you would really benefit from this more than most anons.
Nope. Not at all. Moreover, this particular outline comes on the foundation of hours and hours of foundational buildup at Badlands, in the form of Based Ghost of Patrick Henry, Chris Paul, Jon Harold, etc.
It's not 'laying out an argument'. It's essentially a lecture on an incredibly powerful framework for approach the info war and what has been happening with DJT in 2025/2026.
I am an attorney, and it's never taken me three hours to lay out an argument. It's called the opening statement. If you go on longer than about 30 minutes you've lost not only the jurors, but also the judge.
And I know you're going to say, "WHAT ABOUT THOSE TRIALS THAT TAKE SIX MONTHS!?!?!?!"
Well, you're clearly not an attorney. If you can't present and name all the evidence you have in under 30 minutes, you don't have enough evidence and you're scrambling. Also, anything that starts with movie quotes is suspect to me because the person is evoking emotion, not facts.
There's a reason why the defense always runs about 3X as long as the prosecution. The defense has to create a smokescreen of doubt to win over the jury. If you have the true facts on your side, all it takes is connecting the dots.
I've never gone over about 20 minutes in any case I've ever won and I probably could've cut that in half.
If it takes three hours to lay out an argument, you either suck at editing or you're doing some olympic level gymnastics!
He's a longwinded guy.
This video is thoroughly sound IMO. It explains in detail exactly how you take control of the cabal colour revolutions and redirect them to white hat outcomes.
I think you would really benefit from this more than most anons.
It would really bring on your understanding.
Maybe it would help if you made some time-stamps?
Seconded.
I watched it, and it's a rambling mess.
Really?
So, you didn't watch it then?
Yes, it's just stream of consciousness gibberish.
Nope. Not at all. Moreover, this particular outline comes on the foundation of hours and hours of foundational buildup at Badlands, in the form of Based Ghost of Patrick Henry, Chris Paul, Jon Harold, etc.
It's not 'laying out an argument'. It's essentially a lecture on an incredibly powerful framework for approach the info war and what has been happening with DJT in 2025/2026.
So not an attorney? Got it.
I am an attorney, and it's never taken me three hours to lay out an argument. It's called the opening statement. If you go on longer than about 30 minutes you've lost not only the jurors, but also the judge.
And I know you're going to say, "WHAT ABOUT THOSE TRIALS THAT TAKE SIX MONTHS!?!?!?!"
Well, you're clearly not an attorney. If you can't present and name all the evidence you have in under 30 minutes, you don't have enough evidence and you're scrambling. Also, anything that starts with movie quotes is suspect to me because the person is evoking emotion, not facts.
There's a reason why the defense always runs about 3X as long as the prosecution. The defense has to create a smokescreen of doubt to win over the jury. If you have the true facts on your side, all it takes is connecting the dots.
I've never gone over about 20 minutes in any case I've ever won and I probably could've cut that in half.