So, you just cherry pick what you agree with and discount the rest?
People can make mistakes. But an honest person is willing to own up to those mistakes and correct them. This is especially true for someone that has a vast public platform. Credibility is crucial and it is up to their listeners to call them out when they go off the rails and lose the plot.
I like to think of credibility as a cookie. It has ingredients: flour, sugar, butter, etc. Sounds good right? But, what if you were to put just a small bit of dog crap in that cookie, would you still want to eat it? We must hold these people disseminating information to a higher standard of credibility. Unless of course, you don't mind eating dog poop cookies.
I'm not a Candice supporter, I simply liked the work she was doing in regards to Charlie Kirk. With your logic, couldn't you say the same about POTUS? No new wars right? Nothing to see in the Epstein files right?
As far as the war with Iran. This is not a new war. Iran has been at war with the US for 47 years. So Trump did not break that promise. Trump has decided to finally end it before any more American blood is spilled by the IRGC while others kicked the can down the road letting more lives be lost and Iran holding the world hostage.
As far as the Epstein files. Everyone has their own expectations about was is, and is not, in those files. Some are satisfied while others will never be convinced no matter what is produced. Since none of us can say with any certainty what exactly was contained in those files beyond speculation and rumor, I am not going to condemn Trump for that. Besides, knowing the swamp rats in DC the way we do, who knows what has been done with those files - especially with Biden and Obama's cronies being in the WH for 4 years. The fact is, there has not been anything in those files that implicates Trump - which we already knew there wasn't.
In addition, there has been plenty of incriminating evidence contained in what has been released to expose many people - but not in the way many people expected. That evidence points to much larger networks of political power and financial networks. But, not too many seem to be interested in those connections. Which I might add, will eventually lead to uncovering the rest of some of the evils that many were hoping would be exposed in those files. That saga however, is not over and for some, it may never be. So I will leave it there. But those files are much bigger than many realize or expect.
So, you just cherry pick what you agree with and discount the rest?
People can make mistakes. But an honest person is willing to own up to those mistakes and correct them. This is especially true for someone that has a vast public platform. Credibility is crucial and it is up to their listeners to call them out when they go off the rails and lose the plot.
I like to think of credibility as a cookie. It has ingredients: flour, sugar, butter, etc. Sounds good right? But, what if you were to put just a small bit of dog crap in that cookie, would you still want to eat it? We must hold these people disseminating information to a higher standard of credibility. Unless of course, you don't mind eating dog poop cookies.
I'm not a Candice supporter, I simply liked the work she was doing in regards to Charlie Kirk. With your logic, couldn't you say the same about POTUS? No new wars right? Nothing to see in the Epstein files right?
As far as the war with Iran. This is not a new war. Iran has been at war with the US for 47 years. So Trump did not break that promise. Trump has decided to finally end it before any more American blood is spilled by the IRGC while others kicked the can down the road letting more lives be lost and Iran holding the world hostage.
As far as the Epstein files. Everyone has their own expectations about was is, and is not, in those files. Some are satisfied while others will never be convinced no matter what is produced. Since none of us can say with any certainty what exactly was contained in those files beyond speculation and rumor, I am not going to condemn Trump for that. Besides, knowing the swamp rats in DC the way we do, who knows what has been done with those files - especially with Biden and Obama's cronies being in the WH for 4 years. The fact is, there has not been anything in those files that implicates Trump - which we already knew there wasn't.
In addition, there has been plenty of incriminating evidence contained in what has been released to expose many people - but not in the way many people expected. That evidence points to much larger networks of political power and financial networks. But, not too many seem to be interested in those connections. Which I might add, will eventually lead to uncovering the rest of some of the evils that many were hoping would be exposed in those files. That saga however, is not over and for some, it may never be. So I will leave it there. But those files are much bigger than many realize or expect.