This list is by no means comprehensive. It simply reflects a list of individuals that piqued my interest at some point for some reason. I recently completed some "follow-up research" on several individuals to see whether or not my understanding of where they're "at now" is accurate or not. I used Grok to help with my research.

These are presented in no particular order or importance or appearance.

• SerialBrain2 - Probably the original "weaponized autist" of the entire Q movement, who (as far as I'm aware) introduced many of the pattern recognition concepts that later became stables in Q-decoding circles (like GAW). Posted to their user account on Reddit, which has since been purged (during the Biden era, I think) and never recovered. Many retain echoes of their work on Rumble, Youtube, and other places though.
• Derek Johnson - @rattletrap1776 on X. His commentary on "wartime president" stuff is particularly intriguing. In short, he sites real executive orders and laws but then jumps to an interpretation of what a summation of those things mean when weighed against circumstances throughout the passage of time up through our present day. Still active on X, though notably less patient to "outsiders" who haven't bothered to research his exhaustive earlier works explaining his thoughts on things in detail (many of which are, unfortunately, hidden behind books you have to pay for that he published). He does have significant revenue streams outside of his political commentary though.
• Ivan Raiklin - @IvanRaiklin on X. He's probably not worth mentioning in the larger scheme of things, but his history of being a Green Beret and his confidence against deep state threats (even in the midst of the greatest amounts of suppression during the Biden era) earned him my notice. His biggest claim of note is having a "list" of individuals that (in his mind) need to be investigated for crimes against the United States. He "has the receipts" (as he claims), but the "receipts" in question are often just the list of names itself. I also find it somewhat suspicious that he seemed to avoid any major ban-hammers during times when you'd get kicked off of Twitter for simply sneezing unfavorably at a left-wing talking point.
• Ian Carroll - @IanCarrollShow on X. A more recent public figure. His journey basically stems from wanting to figure out GameStop and Wall Street, discovers patterns of provable corruption, then eventually links (or short-circuits) those findings into Jewish/Israeli State influence. There are probably lots of other "non-Jewish" deep state actors worth investigating, but it's difficult to get past the first major "apparent villain" to see as to whether or not a much larger picture in in play. At the very least, Ian's work on GameStop and Wall Street is well grounded and documented in real data, so the conclusions that led to his later investigations and curiosities have some real "meat" to them.
• JuliansRum - @ItsJuliansRum on X. Often had very thoughtful, level-headed observations on Q, Trump, and "The Plan" (particularly during the first Trump presidency and working onward through the Biden "presidency"). Julian (not his real name, he's still anonymous) has since grown impatient with the "apparent" subservience of Trump to the whims of the Israeli State, the current economic circumstance, and so forth. A part of me feels like he's still optimistic that things can or could get better, but he's adopted a more "realistic" approach since a short time after the beginning of Trump's second term, looking for more immediately relief economically and in reference to government ridding itself of (what now seems as obvious) corruption. That lack of publicly-known prosecutions have been understandably frustrating.
• Clandestine - @WarClandestine on X. Jacob Creech. Found significant notoriety due to his observations on Ukraine corruption, much of which Russia used in its "propaganda" against Ukraine. The most notable piece I recall was a side-by-side comparison map of "US Biolab sites in Ukraine" next to "Russian Missile targets in Ukraine", which mapped up almost perfectly. Jacob/Clandestine has commented on various other topics as well, but Ukraine, foreign policy, and foreign aid remain his staple and most prominent viewpoints across social media. His most recent takes on X seem to have adopted a tired intolerance of "dissenting viewpoints and opinions" against Trump and "The Plan", going so far as to over-simplistically and collectively label many as "traitors" so long as they participate in any measure of effort to undermine trust in Trump and the Plan (seemingly, at least).

There are many, many others perhaps worthy of comment to varying degrees, many of which were mentioned in Q drops specifically (such as Shawn Hannity). People that I once spent a considerable amount of time listening to now barely show up on my radar when trying to "monitor the situation" from a "Q-informed perspective". The ones that seem to fall off the hardest when it comes to whether or not I value their time with my attention are the ones that are earning some kind of income off their political exposure and commentary (of which Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, and others qualify to some degree). Some ideas are still worth noticing though, even from "paid influencers", because they can at least introduce a question or topic worthy of further investigation. Heck, Joe Rogan's entire podcast is built around him finding interesting people to talk to and asking questions, so he's "earning money from it" but hopefully in a way that promotes useful inquiry rather than mindless cultism loyalty.

I think it's fine to recognize that all of our opinions and understandings on things are continuously evolving, and there's no need to be "loyal" to anything except the Truth itself (which, for many, is simply "Christ"). Cheers.