Christianity came to supersede judasim but yes we share 5 books of the old testament.
But to say America was founded with judeo values is a stretch and not true --when it was Christian values.
The term "Judeo-Christian" is a 20th-century construct. It gained traction in the 1930s–1950s, initially among liberals to combat anti-Semitism and fascism by emphasizing shared roots of Judaism and Christianity, then during the Cold War to unify against "godless communism." It was not used by the founders or in founding-era documents. Judaism had minimal direct influence on 18th-century American political thought—Jews were a tiny minority, and Old Testament ideas were filtered almost entirely through Christian (especially Protestant) interpretation.
Claiming "Judeo-Christian" retroactively includes Judaism in a way that doesn't match the historical record, where the dominant cultural force was Christianity (Protestant varieties). It often serves modern rhetorical purposes (e.g., inclusivity or cultural conservatism) rather than precise history.
But yes just go ahead and keep parroting the line.
“Christianity came to supersede judasim but yes we share 5 books of the old testament.”
Yeah, you missed the mark - those 5 books that you so carelessly acknowledged form the basis of Christianity. The creation is explained, the Creator illuminated, the introduction of evil, the fall of mankind, the Seed War proclaimed, the Redeemer foretold, the war exposed, the playing field leveled, and the main players named…And that’s just Genesis.
And you forgot about the chronicles of the kings and the writings of the prophets. You’re not a serious person if you can’t recognize facts.
You might want to read your Bible again, it’s very specific. Maybe you missed this part:
[Rev 7:4-8 KJV] 4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: [and there were] sealed an hundred [and] forty [and] four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel. 5 Of the tribe of Juda [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad [were] sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of the tribe of Aser [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses [were] sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of the tribe of Simeon [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar [were] sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of the tribe of Zabulon [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin [were] sealed twelve thousand.
Right back at ya dude. I know your late to this party so here you go:
Here's a catholic exorcism priest talking about it.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVjBP6miaKi/ (Fr. Ripperger: “The big mistake that people make is still thinking the Jews are the chosen people—they were, but they rejected their inheritance. They refused to accept Christ.”)
The "former" shift in Christian theology:
Christians believe Jesus Christ fulfilled the Old Covenant and established a New Covenant (see Jeremiah 31:31-34, quoted in Hebrews 8 in the New Testament). In this view:Many first-century Jews accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but the religious leadership largely rejected Him, leading to His crucifixion.
The New Testament teaches that the covenant blessings now extend to all who believe in Christ—Jews and Gentiles alike—forming the Church as the "new Israel" or "spiritual Israel" (e.g., Romans 9-11 discusses this transition; Galatians 3:28-29 says believers in Christ are Abraham's true heirs; 1 Peter 2:9 applies the "chosen people" language to the Church).
Traditional Catholic teaching (and views expressed by some exorcists/theologians) holds that by rejecting Christ, the Jewish people as a collective apostatized from their role as the elect. Their unique status as the sole "chosen" transferred to the Church. Jerusalem's destruction in 70 AD is sometimes cited as a historical sign of this shift (fulfilling prophecies like those in Matthew 23-24).
Fr. Chad Ripperger (the priest in the video) summarizes it this way in the clip: the Jews were the chosen people, but by rejecting Christ they "lost their status as the elect, which was then transferred to Christians who believe in Him." This reflects a classic supersessionist or fulfillment theology common in Catholicism: the Church doesn't replace Israel out of spite but completes what the Old Covenant pointed toward.
In short, the "former" label comes from the Christian belief that the Messiah's arrival changed the covenant's structure—it's no longer limited to one ethnic group but open to a universal Church. This is a theological interpretation, not a historical or empirical claim, and it has been debated for centuries.
Hope this helps you from not parroting Ben Shapiro and daily wire lines.
Christianity came to supersede judasim but yes we share 5 books of the old testament.
But to say America was founded with judeo values is a stretch and not true --when it was Christian values.
The term "Judeo-Christian" is a 20th-century construct. It gained traction in the 1930s–1950s, initially among liberals to combat anti-Semitism and fascism by emphasizing shared roots of Judaism and Christianity, then during the Cold War to unify against "godless communism." It was not used by the founders or in founding-era documents. Judaism had minimal direct influence on 18th-century American political thought—Jews were a tiny minority, and Old Testament ideas were filtered almost entirely through Christian (especially Protestant) interpretation.
Claiming "Judeo-Christian" retroactively includes Judaism in a way that doesn't match the historical record, where the dominant cultural force was Christianity (Protestant varieties). It often serves modern rhetorical purposes (e.g., inclusivity or cultural conservatism) rather than precise history.
But yes just go ahead and keep parroting the line.
“Christianity came to supersede judasim but yes we share 5 books of the old testament.”
Yeah, you missed the mark - those 5 books that you so carelessly acknowledged form the basis of Christianity. The creation is explained, the Creator illuminated, the introduction of evil, the fall of mankind, the Seed War proclaimed, the Redeemer foretold, the war exposed, the playing field leveled, and the main players named…And that’s just Genesis.
And you forgot about the chronicles of the kings and the writings of the prophets. You’re not a serious person if you can’t recognize facts.
Says the guy using a coined term from the early 1900s lol.
I need you to reread my comments slower. Doesn't sound like you absorb things well.
Plus somehow you've already lost the plot that America was not founded on judeo values. But sip that copium harder.
Since we want to talk facts more don't forget Jews = God's former chosen people.
You might want to read your Bible again, it’s very specific. Maybe you missed this part: [Rev 7:4-8 KJV] 4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: [and there were] sealed an hundred [and] forty [and] four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel. 5 Of the tribe of Juda [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad [were] sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of the tribe of Aser [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses [were] sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of the tribe of Simeon [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar [were] sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of the tribe of Zabulon [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph [were] sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin [were] sealed twelve thousand.
Right back at ya dude. I know your late to this party so here you go:
Here's a catholic exorcism priest talking about it.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVjBP6miaKi/ (Fr. Ripperger: “The big mistake that people make is still thinking the Jews are the chosen people—they were, but they rejected their inheritance. They refused to accept Christ.”)
The "former" shift in Christian theology:
Christians believe Jesus Christ fulfilled the Old Covenant and established a New Covenant (see Jeremiah 31:31-34, quoted in Hebrews 8 in the New Testament). In this view:Many first-century Jews accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but the religious leadership largely rejected Him, leading to His crucifixion.
The New Testament teaches that the covenant blessings now extend to all who believe in Christ—Jews and Gentiles alike—forming the Church as the "new Israel" or "spiritual Israel" (e.g., Romans 9-11 discusses this transition; Galatians 3:28-29 says believers in Christ are Abraham's true heirs; 1 Peter 2:9 applies the "chosen people" language to the Church).
Traditional Catholic teaching (and views expressed by some exorcists/theologians) holds that by rejecting Christ, the Jewish people as a collective apostatized from their role as the elect. Their unique status as the sole "chosen" transferred to the Church. Jerusalem's destruction in 70 AD is sometimes cited as a historical sign of this shift (fulfilling prophecies like those in Matthew 23-24).
Fr. Chad Ripperger (the priest in the video) summarizes it this way in the clip: the Jews were the chosen people, but by rejecting Christ they "lost their status as the elect, which was then transferred to Christians who believe in Him." This reflects a classic supersessionist or fulfillment theology common in Catholicism: the Church doesn't replace Israel out of spite but completes what the Old Covenant pointed toward.
In short, the "former" label comes from the Christian belief that the Messiah's arrival changed the covenant's structure—it's no longer limited to one ethnic group but open to a universal Church. This is a theological interpretation, not a historical or empirical claim, and it has been debated for centuries.
Hope this helps you from not parroting Ben Shapiro and daily wire lines.
So what you’re saying is that God made a mistake about choosing the Jews because He wasn’t omniscient. Um, yeah, that’s kinda stupid.