It's clearly an interpretive argument (unless I'm totally missing something in the Constitution text), but even then I don't know exactly what they're getting at.
The closest I can surmise is the idea that something legally occurs when the House impeaches, that is perhaps reverted by the Senate?
Not new. Don't post shit that others might share and then look like idiots for sharing something false. You'll make us all look retarded. Or, maybe that was your plan...
Grok uses Snopes for verification.
Not seeing this here: https://uscode.house.gov/static/constitution.pdf
Searched for " term" " conviction", " nullified" and see nothing to support this.
I don't trust either of them.
Why would I want to “blow snowflakes minds” with a lie?
It's clearly an interpretive argument (unless I'm totally missing something in the Constitution text), but even then I don't know exactly what they're getting at.
The closest I can surmise is the idea that something legally occurs when the House impeaches, that is perhaps reverted by the Senate?
I am assuming so.
Sauce?
Someone sent it to me.
Lighten up new account.
Not new. Don't post shit that others might share and then look like idiots for sharing something false. You'll make us all look retarded. Or, maybe that was your plan...
Yeah sure.