👉🏻 https://x.com/SandraXFreedom/status/2044056142247075873
👉🏻 https://nitter.net/SandraXFreedom/status/2044056142247075873
(Copypasta follows.)
Excellent article!!⛪️
Misunderstandings Have Created Weak Catholic Men
By Black Monk Rosaries on FaceBook
Two common modern biblical misreadings have done real damage to Catholic men: first, the lazy notion that “turn the other cheek” means be a doormat; and second, the sloppy translation of Exodus 20:13 as “Thou shalt not kill,” which muddies the actual command: You shall not murder. And yes, those errors have consequences. They do not produce saints. They produce spinelessness dressed up as piety.
The Cheek Slap in Jesus’ Day
In Jesus’ world, a slap on the cheek was not “violence” the way we use the word today. It was public humiliation, a dominance move. Jesus gets even more specific. A strike on the right cheek implies a backhand. That was not just rude. It was the kind of insult that could carry a doubled fine because it was considered a severe public assault on dignity.
So what does Jesus say to do?
Not to stand there and take it forever.
He says to turn the other cheek.
That move is not submission. It is defiance with restraint. Turning the left cheek refuses the shaming script. It forces the aggressor to choose: either stop, or escalate in a way that treats the other person not as a lesser, but as an equal. A palm strike is not how you smack a subordinate. It is how you strike someone you are willing to recognize as a peer.
In plain terms, you do not cower. You deny them the power to degrade you. Your honor is not granted by the bully. It comes from somewhere higher, and you act like it. Yet Christians have managed to misread this into a spirituality of total passivity, as if holiness means quietly absorbing abuse, never resisting wrongdoing, never confronting evil, and never defending the innocent. That is not meekness. That is moral paralysis, and it has been sold to men as virtue for far too long. But that reading does not fit the Jewish moral universe Jesus spoke within. Judaism teaches that preserving life, pikuach nefesh, is a supreme duty, and stopping harm is an obligation. “Turn the other cheek” is about insult and domination tactics. It teaches dignity, self-control, and refusal to retaliate — not submission to actual violence.
Exodus 20:13: The Hebrew Did Not Stutter
Exodus 20:13 says: לֹא תִּרְצָח (Lo tirtsach) — You shall not murder.
The verb רָצַח (ratsach) is not a blanket ban on all killing. It condemns killing marked by malice, treachery, and injustice the shedding of innocent blood. It is a command to uphold the sanctity of life, not to surrender it through cowardice or confusion. If “Thou shalt not kill” meant all killing without exception, then how did the Hebrews fight wars? How did Israel defend itself? How did David fight Goliath? The Old Testament is filled with warfare, commanded at times by God Himself. Either Scripture contradicts itself, or the commandment has been misunderstood. The Hebrew did not stutter. The prohibition is against murder not against justice, not against defense, not against protecting the innocent.
Just War: Not Dogma, a Moral Framework
Here is where modern minds get sloppy again. Catholics hear “Just War” and assume it is either a triumphant permission slip or a concept that is automatically un-Christian. It is neither. Just War is not a doctrine you “believe” like the Trinity, and it is not dogma you recite like a creed. It is a moral framework a set of guardrails meant to help fallen human beings navigate a fallen world. It exists because real life is not a children’s book where every villain twirls a mustache and every hero wins without blood.
The world is not simple. It is not clean. It is messy. Sometimes the choices are not good versus evil, but evil versus worse evil. In that kind of world, refusing to resist aggression is not holiness. It can be complicity. If evil men invade, slaughter, rape, and burn, you do not fix that with slogans. You stop it. If stopping it requires force, even lethal force, then the moral responsibility is not to wring your hands. It is to protect the innocent.
Defending your country, your family, and your people can be justified, even if it means going to war. Not because war is good, but because allowing murder and tyranny to roam free is worse. Just War thinking, at its best, is the Church insisting that if you must fight, you must fight justly with discipline, with limits, and with moral clarity. It is the refusal to become what you are fighting.
The Correction Catholic Men Need
Let us say it plainly. Wimpy Catholicism is not Catholicism. It is a modern wimp wearing a crucifix. Men have been taught that being nice is holiness, that confrontation is unchristian, that strength is suspicious, and that the only safe virtue is softness. That is not the tradition. It is not Scripture. It is not the saints.
The faith that built cathedrals, founded hospitals, converted nations, and produced martyrs was not powered by men afraid of conflict. It was powered by men who feared God more than they feared discomfort, and who knew that love sometimes looks like a shield, not a slogan.
So yes, the passive misreadings need to be corrected. Not to make men cruel, but to make them clear. Not to make men violent, but to make them capable. Not to make men arrogant, but to make them steady. Because the world does not need more Catholics trained to flinch. It needs Catholics who can stand between evil and the innocent and say, without apology: Not here. Not today. Not while I still have breath.
I’ve been preaching this for years. Weak people in positions of power continually dilute plainly written documents such as this, the constitution and bill of rights.