If I had to guess. 18 is probably more a reference to the fact that every detail of people’s personal lives gets plastered everywhere and can be leading news stories. Rather than hiding anything illicit or illegal they did in a professional setting.
Which to Palantirs point would serve as a deterrent for many good people.
From embarrassing things they said or did decades ago. To personal family drama and everything in between. Already both administrations saw people working in them harassed. Their families were harassed etc. Over stuff that occurred ultimately decades ago that journalists drug up in an attempt to discredit them.
Or to put it more simply. Whether someone is a competent administrator and capable of doing the work they are hired and or appointed to do. Should be the main concern. But in the current environment. Whether they watch way too much Anime on their days off. Said something stupid a decade ago or made a joke that landed poorly. Have Juvenile or immature hobbies etc. Things of that nature ultimately are things that are brought up and plastered all over. Ultimately to intentionally portray it like it’s a bad thing
Could be. We don't judge people making bad jokes or stupid things they did in the past, though. We want to know if the person is honorable and can do the work.
Fair enough reason. I’m mostly making the conscious effort to be more idealistic, or at the very least not immediately assume the worst. Instead of my typical default of cynical pessimism.
If I had to guess. 18 is probably more a reference to the fact that every detail of people’s personal lives gets plastered everywhere and can be leading news stories. Rather than hiding anything illicit or illegal they did in a professional setting.
Which to Palantirs point would serve as a deterrent for many good people.
From embarrassing things they said or did decades ago. To personal family drama and everything in between. Already both administrations saw people working in them harassed. Their families were harassed etc. Over stuff that occurred ultimately decades ago that journalists drug up in an attempt to discredit them.
Or to put it more simply. Whether someone is a competent administrator and capable of doing the work they are hired and or appointed to do. Should be the main concern. But in the current environment. Whether they watch way too much Anime on their days off. Said something stupid a decade ago or made a joke that landed poorly. Have Juvenile or immature hobbies etc. Things of that nature ultimately are things that are brought up and plastered all over. Ultimately to intentionally portray it like it’s a bad thing
Could be. We don't judge people making bad jokes or stupid things they did in the past, though. We want to know if the person is honorable and can do the work.
Exactly my point and what I personally believe the intention was.
Though it’s tough to not also immediately assume the worst as well. As the wording could easily be interpreted both ways.
I do assume the worse especially with that company (Palantir = All Seeing Stone)
Fair enough reason. I’m mostly making the conscious effort to be more idealistic, or at the very least not immediately assume the worst. Instead of my typical default of cynical pessimism.
It was starting to negatively affect my health.
and has good judgement over a long period.
Thanks.
for what
Dems do.
Darn right.
And after they did it, we now do it too.