Going one layer deeper:

Andros or Androus, is an adjective, and NOT a noun.

This same matter can be ascertained by tracing the origins of the word man: an adjective.

This stands in stark relief to to word used for woman in Germanic languages: frau, frouwe, frouja, This is a title of honor. As opposed to husband (cattle herder) and wife. It expresses a different cultural relationship.

Androus is therefor a synthetic of two ideas: full of (adjective) and walking (from sanskrit: aner).

Interestingly: in Germanic language this idea of walking vs not walking is present in the idea of life and death.

OR, to put a more Latin point to it: full of vril: virility: life force. A man keeps his tip up for sure.

Focused on AI:

It is not androus, full of life's energy. And anything untethered to life = dead. And indeed, it is an algo that is based on certain real life data and a lot of synthetic (self produced) data.

It belongs to the realm of man to self-determine. Meaning: what is it you see, and what does it mean. As a consequences the choice is also yours. That is what freedom is all about.

AI, however, really tries its hardest to tell you what you see, what it means and what is appropriate to do. Subtle manipulation by offering sympathy and seemingly understanding.

And since it bases itself on its data, to such a system it is fact. Any information you might have, however truthful, is of no consequence. That is its weakness, and its freighting position at the same time.

So, if WE do not take care, we will:

1. appropriate its language
2. appropriate its manipulation
3. lose out self-determination.

It is as Reinhard May once sang: if you do not use your freedom, it erodes.[Die Freiheit nutzt sich ab wenn du Sie nicht nutzt]

Hence, we have to keep out tip up lest we, by our own choice, degrade ourselves.

Final point:

I am not saying: do not use it. I am saying: be very careful what you let it do for you. It is not the first time the so called : Protectors and trustees walk away with the loot.

And your life energy: already taken by taxes, still represents a gargantuan loot.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/anthropic

Anthropos sometimes is explained as a compound of anēr and ōps (genitive ōpos) "eye, face;" so literally "he who has the face of a man." The change of -d- to -th- is difficult to explain; perhaps it is from some lost dialectal variant, or the mistaken belief that there was an aspiration sign over the vowel in the second element (as though *-dhropo-), which mistake might have come about by influence of common verbs such as horao "to see." But Beekes writes, "As no IE explanation has been found, the word is probably of substrate origin."

Who is Anthropic's secret shareholder?: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASG9cmS8N/breaking-down-anthropics-ownersh/c/

"Anthropic AI robots" that look like humans are likely coming. Why do they insist on making them look like humans? If they can make fake humans, why do they need real ones? It is mockery right in our and God's face, and these demons just can't help themselves. At least Elon had the good sense to not give his OPTIMUS robots lifelike human faces.