He's a conundrum. He's cited constitutional law to back Trump for a long time yet he's also been a long time democrat and used to be Epstein's attorney..
Can't a 'good' lawyers can find justification for any position they want but make it look like the most natural truth? I think he flipped, plane & siimple
Once he 1st went for Trump, I don't think he ever went strongly against him. (All while making it look scholarly)
He's a conundrum. He's cited constitutional law to back Trump for a long time yet he's also been a long time democrat and used to be Epstein's attorney..
He was literally the only person who would take Epstein's case in 2009.
Also, don't forget he defended OJ Simpson and that black NASCAR guy who "found" the noose. He also turned on Julian Assange.
In other words, don't trust, but verify anyway
Can't a 'good' lawyers can find justification for any position they want but make it look like the most natural truth? I think he flipped, plane & siimple
Once he 1st went for Trump, I don't think he ever went strongly against him. (All while making it look scholarly)