I can’t debate you on the he-said/she-said stuff,

Its not he said/she said. Its "she said / I disproved with sauce" - no brainer for a real truth seeker really.

if you don’t listen to the journalists who report these things

So you are saying I should trust these people even when the things they say are provably false

No one said Trump killed Charlie directly..

Of course that would be a stupid assertion to make since Trump was not in the crowd that day pulling the trigger. But even with that caveat it is so easy to prove you wrong with Sauce

See, this is the whole point of Candace. She thinks she is smart and tries not to "say" things but put thoughts in people's mind without evidence like a mind virus, that contaminates everything they think about after that. But she is not that smart and she lets loose her real intentions eventually, always.

Oh, and this is exactly the same way people on the left get brainwashed by their favourite "investigative journalists", except our side are supposedly smarter.

But let’s focus on the bullet. How could you possibly think a 30-06 did that damage to Charlie’s neck?

Yes lets focus on the bullet. Personally firing a weapon does not make you an expert. You gotta look at the evidence. The recently unsealed documents show that even the defense does not argue that a 30-06 was used for the assassination. And no, FBI does not release all their evidence and before the trial and no, not even if Candace wants to do "her own investigation"

So you can focus on the bullet at the trial when all the evidence is presented and Tyler Robinson has a chance to demolish the evidence if he can. And if you think the judge was unfair and did not preside over a fair trial (which is very possible) then you can bring it up and we can discuss it. Until then, we simply dont have enough to focus on the bullet

https://youtu.be/fQ9VOlaBBeo?t=1688

Dude I am SO glad you posted this.

First point, note the date of this: Oct 13th 2023 - 2 years before he was killed.

Hang on, hang on, now check this point in the same video: https://www.youtube.com/live/fQ9VOlaBBeo?si=BrJL8XV_gD7TYW8x&t=1814 @30:14

He explains what he meant by the "Standdown order"

And and by the way, I I'm actually very pro-Israel. So, let me be very I mean,

No, no. I just want to make sure my position is clear here

It's possible that the Netanyahu government was double crossed by bad agents

Another aspect is that Netanyahu might have traitors in his government

Exact quote from video "Jewish donors - they have a lot of explaining to do"

I am glad you linked this too. Guess what? This was 2 years before his death as well. And guess what else? He had Jewish donors still donating millions after that. Now ... thats funny wouldn't you say, if all Jews were one clump of clay and you "call one out" and they all turn on you?

Let me give you another example of Charlie calling out the Jews, I mean this one should be prescribed reading/listening fo all Anons. He breaks down the evil Jews and normal Jews in under 10 seconds like no one can.

And guess what, they still kept funding him millions.

So here are a few things to ponder about:

• Why did Charlie say in the private chat "Maybe I should step back from pro-Israel causes" ?

Answer is already known - because the Jewish billionaires started pulling back funding.

Was it because he was already "getting redpilled on Jews" ? No, because Charlie has always been a redpill machine when it comes to Jews. he knew them inside out, the good, the bad and the ugly.

Before I tell you why the billionaires pulled out I will ask you: Is it a coincidence that he was killed the very next day he was venting his frustrations about these Jewish billionaires in a private chat ?

C'mon, even you wouldnt think Netanyahu was snooping into his text message and decided to set up a hit job the very next day.

I will tell you why the billionaires were pulling back, and you will see it was not a coincidence.

Billionaires were pulling back because of ...... Tucker f'kin Carlson .... supposed friend of Charlie, who had a huge platform of his own, but decided to go on an important TPUSA and then for the first time go on a complete rant claiming all Jews were evil.

Tucker knew Charlie would not deplatform him.

Tucker also knew the billionaire donors would not like their platform being used to be called evil.

Tucker knew this would put a deep divide between Charlie and his funders.

And someone knew that he was ranting on Israel the day before the hit.

And we also know Andrew (who was on the chat) shared the exact screenshot in the coming days with Joe Kent.

And we also know Joe Kent said that screenshot was being used to consider "foreign forces behind Charlie's death"

And we also know Arctic Frost targeted Charlie Kirk.

C'mon, you dont need to be a Candace Owen to put this much together to know exactly who killed Charlie Kirk