Appreciated but research would seem kind of pointless in that scenario. True I agree the cabal can easily manipulate and alter history on the internet to some extent.
But in this case, why would they want to fake the history of the accounts banner image. Since it is archived on the wayback machine, and the date is listed on the study itself where the image originates, 5/5/2022. (5:5)
Both of those would need to be in on it to, or hacked by the deepstate. But then the time machine website would presumably notice right now if the pic in their article had been changed with all this attention brought to it?
For Example, I only discovered Q in 2021. I then went down the rabbithole and researched and verified all of the old prominent Q proofs to know if i could believe them, I never saw Q post in real time, I can only trust the archives and tweets and youtube videos etc. to verify the timestamps on Q's posts that are vital to Q proofs. If i can't trust those sources, how can i trust anything?
Appreciated but research would seem kind of pointless in that scenario. True I agree the cabal can easily manipulate and alter history on the internet to some extent.
But in this case, why would they want to fake the history of the accounts banner image. Since it is archived on the wayback machine, and the date is listed on the study itself where the image originates, 5/5/2022. (5:5)
Both of those would need to be in on it to, or hacked by the deepstate. But then the time machine website would presumably notice right now if the pic in their article had been changed with all this attention brought to it?
For Example, I only discovered Q in 2021. I then went down the rabbithole and researched and verified all of the old prominent Q proofs to know if i could believe them, I never saw Q post in real time, I can only trust the archives and tweets and youtube videos etc. to verify the timestamps on Q's posts that are vital to Q proofs. If i can't trust those sources, how can i trust anything?