Even if Germany won WW2 I highly highly doubt the British would be speaking German. It's such a bad trope.
Of course it would have been better had the war not happened at all. There was also the option to have just shrugged when Germany asked for return of territories lost in WW1. Or even better, if WW1 had never happened.
It was all a big trick from the beginning. Monied interests trying to get even more money while killing off good men who knew nothing and cared nothing for the grievances of greedy bastards.
Those wars were a shame on everyone, and, there were good people on both sides forced into it by bad actors on both sides. Hidden hands guiding good men to their deaths.
I imagine Europe would have been a paradise in some alternate timeline where none of it ever happened.
Is that a bad thing? At least, the language in use would have been far more logical and original than the bastardized version we call English.
What is it? Crooked Greek? Crooked Latin?
But, on a different note, If it weren't for Poles, we'd be spreaking Turkic, or the Frenchies for that matter, we'd be speaking Arabic.
What kind of an argument is that?
If it weren't for the English, in the US, Japan, and quite frankly, the rest in the world in terms of trade, we'd be speaking Dutch.
It has nothing to do with NATO. NATO is nothing more than a cover for Empire, where US muscle and treasure is expended. To me, that seems a very good reason to at least "re-imagine" NATO; to borrow a phrase from Klaus Schwabs blue book.
Splice in the Islamic version. Around the time the Treaty of Lisbon was pushed down the throat of the people of Europe, it was alleged that there was a : Judeo-Christian-islamic foundation to the culture of several European peoples.
Even if Germany won WW2 I highly highly doubt the British would be speaking German. It's such a bad trope.
Of course it would have been better had the war not happened at all. There was also the option to have just shrugged when Germany asked for return of territories lost in WW1. Or even better, if WW1 had never happened.
It was all a big trick from the beginning. Monied interests trying to get even more money while killing off good men who knew nothing and cared nothing for the grievances of greedy bastards.
Those wars were a shame on everyone, and, there were good people on both sides forced into it by bad actors on both sides. Hidden hands guiding good men to their deaths.
I imagine Europe would have been a paradise in some alternate timeline where none of it ever happened.
We dont need nato at all. So change theybwill amd without us i hope. Then kick the un out of our country onece and for all
Is that a bad thing? At least, the language in use would have been far more logical and original than the bastardized version we call English.
What is it? Crooked Greek? Crooked Latin?
But, on a different note, If it weren't for Poles, we'd be spreaking Turkic, or the Frenchies for that matter, we'd be speaking Arabic.
What kind of an argument is that?
If it weren't for the English, in the US, Japan, and quite frankly, the rest in the world in terms of trade, we'd be speaking Dutch.
It has nothing to do with NATO. NATO is nothing more than a cover for Empire, where US muscle and treasure is expended. To me, that seems a very good reason to at least "re-imagine" NATO; to borrow a phrase from Klaus Schwabs blue book.
Id rather be speaking german than the talmudic values of modern europe
Splice in the Islamic version. Around the time the Treaty of Lisbon was pushed down the throat of the people of Europe, it was alleged that there was a : Judeo-Christian-islamic foundation to the culture of several European peoples.
disgusting as it is .....
...and WW 1. Even Omar could get that one right.