That's a great timeline. Thanks. I do not have a reason as to why he did not mount a defense. But I would not be surprised that if he is/was a Mossad asset that he had been taken over by the White Hats and that he was told it was not time to divulge the truth. To help quell the situation he bowed out with his statement under oath that he agreed that it was not a hoax. Last nights final statement from him was directly opposite that under oath statement. Perhaps his punishment from the WH's was that he would lose his empire, and to be spared he had a role to play. It's been a long time since I reviewed the SH info, but there were too many questions... why so many of the murdered students seemed to be alive; why the school building was not functional or being used, supposedly, at the time of the attack; the footage of the emergency management drill with people walking in a pattern through the buildings; and other unanswered questions regarding mysterious lottery-like money flowing into the community. So, I am not convinced it was real, and I lean towards it being a hoax, and I have no idea why AJ didn't defend himself.
other unanswered questions regarding mysterious lottery-like money flowing into the community
I am glad you mentioned this, because this was one thing I could actually dig into and disprove as disinformation. The claim was that all the parents of those kids were given a free house based on the local government records which was some kind of an accounting database that suddenly should a house for $450,000 or so for each of the parent's addresses.
Looked very suspicious and like a smoking gun. Thats when I dug into it, and found that every house in that locality had the same entry because they moved paper recards into a digital system and seeded with initial entries.
This is the kind of stuff that makes thse "conspiracy theories" so frustrating. There are a hundred claims, many of which no one can every verify. But the ones you do verify turn out to be fake.
Its these "great amount of little lies" that can be used to effectively change the way a person thinks about a situation because its very hard to disprove a 100 small lies than one big lie.
It’s like “yeah, I ‘proved’ it, but all the foundational facts were made up.”
It gets really hard to say what the point is after that… we can’t leave these people alone because they rely on consent, which includes not saying anything, but we can’t pin them on anything because we rarely, if ever, have any facts that hold up, either.
I hadn't heard that one about the houses, so it wasn't part of my reasoning. I also believe 9/11 was an inside job. So I am prone to believe that it is very feasible to pull off something like SH and then have the right people in the right places to debunk the inconsistencies that seem to "prove" a conspiracy theory.
That's a great timeline. Thanks. I do not have a reason as to why he did not mount a defense. But I would not be surprised that if he is/was a Mossad asset that he had been taken over by the White Hats and that he was told it was not time to divulge the truth. To help quell the situation he bowed out with his statement under oath that he agreed that it was not a hoax. Last nights final statement from him was directly opposite that under oath statement. Perhaps his punishment from the WH's was that he would lose his empire, and to be spared he had a role to play. It's been a long time since I reviewed the SH info, but there were too many questions... why so many of the murdered students seemed to be alive; why the school building was not functional or being used, supposedly, at the time of the attack; the footage of the emergency management drill with people walking in a pattern through the buildings; and other unanswered questions regarding mysterious lottery-like money flowing into the community. So, I am not convinced it was real, and I lean towards it being a hoax, and I have no idea why AJ didn't defend himself.
I am glad you mentioned this, because this was one thing I could actually dig into and disprove as disinformation. The claim was that all the parents of those kids were given a free house based on the local government records which was some kind of an accounting database that suddenly should a house for $450,000 or so for each of the parent's addresses.
Looked very suspicious and like a smoking gun. Thats when I dug into it, and found that every house in that locality had the same entry because they moved paper recards into a digital system and seeded with initial entries.
This is the kind of stuff that makes thse "conspiracy theories" so frustrating. There are a hundred claims, many of which no one can every verify. But the ones you do verify turn out to be fake.
Its these "great amount of little lies" that can be used to effectively change the way a person thinks about a situation because its very hard to disprove a 100 small lies than one big lie.
This kind of stuff drives me absolutely batty.
It’s like “yeah, I ‘proved’ it, but all the foundational facts were made up.”
It gets really hard to say what the point is after that… we can’t leave these people alone because they rely on consent, which includes not saying anything, but we can’t pin them on anything because we rarely, if ever, have any facts that hold up, either.
I hadn't heard that one about the houses, so it wasn't part of my reasoning. I also believe 9/11 was an inside job. So I am prone to believe that it is very feasible to pull off something like SH and then have the right people in the right places to debunk the inconsistencies that seem to "prove" a conspiracy theory.