Candace Owens Getting Sued
(www.forbes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (87)
sorted by:
That is how you breakdown a brainwashed brain. By pointing out inconsistencies and hoping they will wake up.
So you're now woke to Stratfor's connect, and Court TV as Kangaroo Court. Agreements aren't convictions or even 'decisions' and 'Alex Jones' brainwashes as a LARP.
I don't appreciate the insinuation that one who brings you new information is the one brainwashed and seems to violate Rule Number 1 as a personal attack rather than providing information.
Hope that wakes a lot of people up.
FACT: Alex Jones had 3 years of discovery. Here is YET ANOTHER proof: One of Alex Jones Deposition video and the exact timestamp is where he had his chance to make his claim and back it up.
Discovery phase was not allowed to Alex Jones in court. Period. There wasn't even a 'decision' determined. He settled by agreement instead.
I hope you understand how discussions work. You cant make a statement like that and add "Period" and expect people to say "Oh okay, if you say Period, it must be correct".
I already gave you proof that discovery happened. I gave you the link to the deposition of Alex Jones where he was asked point blank whether he did indeed do deep research and discover that SH was 100% fake.
The next reply from you should be to answer "Why didn't he stand by his claim if we wanted to prove with evidence that SH was fake?" and not just statements with no backing.
If you want to continue this discussion you will answer that question, otherwise I will assume that you are simply another brainwashed mass - we have them on both sides.
Did it work?
Not sure what you intended to prove with a link to someone's opinion.
Every post or article is an 'opinion' then isn't it? It's the facts used or ignored that determine the veracity, not opinions.
Yes and thats why its very important to read an article, then think about what facts are the article based on, and then verify the sources to confirm that the facts are real.
After that, whether you accept the opinions presented or not depends on your own critical thinking.
This is how we should approach research.
Think about what you said here carefully. Its possible for an article use true facts and yet use logical fallacies to create a false narrative. You always have to use your own critical thinking. No amount of "trust" in anyone or "confirmation bias" is a substitute for critical thinking