Candace Owens Getting Sued
(www.forbes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (87)
sorted by:
I took two years of law before deciding to change coarse/course due to seeing how corrupt the courts were 45 years ago. Did you know that a deposition is not discovery? Why do you attempt to conflate the two? Intentionally or you don't know the law? The discovery (in a REAL case) would have immediately tanked the case. Do you know why? Why not?
Do you pick arguments with OG polymaths by mistake or just like to take punishment? You're embarrassing yourself. I already told you to move on, but triggered, you keep coming back like a dog to its own vomit. Frens in truth stick to discussing actual facts. Fact is, AJ is a LARP on Stratfor's payroll (was) and there was no discovery phase for reasons that you have to admit escape you. Move on, this bordering on harassment as you keep making false 'points'.
Thank goodness you dropped Law after two years.
Yeah, I saw it from a higher perspective than was being taught and practiced. It is a good thing I dropped it. Too bad you never bothered. Any other subjects you'd care to be schooled on?
Triggered.
Oh look.....another ad hoc attack from bubble_burst because his bubble was burst. I'm being stalked. Any moderators out there? kek
No I was just making an observation on the fact that you do not need two years to learn that Depositions are a big part of Discovery.
But I do admire the straight face with which you keep pretending that you did not click on the screenshot.
So YOU discovered that the discovered the discovery phase was sabotaged. You're welcome. You denied it at first. I'm not the one who needs redpilled on both the corrupt law, and AJ's involvement with Stratfor as LARP. I've not changed MY position because it isn't MY position. I'll leave the mental gymnastics of positioning and projection to lesser minds. It's okay, we find that most judges either don't know or care about the law either as our current condition shows. Hey smart guy......my very first posting on 8 and 4 chan a decade ago was about how the MSM are the avante gard and the judges are rear guard and how and why that has to be taken back. I then posted a meme about 'Army of Juan', showing before anyone seem to know, that a literal army of immigrants was being formed and would be used in a coup. Of course I had already known about this plan for decades before then, knowing the Bush family was involved. Another meme had "FISA, you're tearing us apart".....showing the FISA files to be the endgame eye-opener which is about to occur NOW. How bout you? My diligent studies leave little time for headgames with unqualified hall monitors.
Love how you ADMIT you're the one who's all keen on getting the 'last word' and project it onto the guy who says 'Move On'.......right? ........right? And that you find feeble lying to prove ZERO points you have to concede to me as 'fun'. I switched from law to psychology (but I didn't stop there). Would you like a diagnosis of such behavior? Using projection and deceit in place of facts and information is no way to go through life.
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
So NOW you concede AJ is a LARP and he tanked his own case.
Lets recap where you started off from:
Implying he was not allowed a rightful discovery.
Took a long time, but glad I kept pushing until you finally saw the FACTs.
FACT is: Both parties didn't 'allow' it due to intentional sabotage. The phase didn't happen and was scuttled due to the arranged 'agreement' between the two, the opposite of justice and a prime example of Kangaroo Court.
How's that law degree coming?
This word concession. I don't think it means what you think it means. If I stated that AJ is a LARP and tanked his own case (with help from corrupt judge), that wouldn't be a concessiion. If you now understand the truth in it, you'd be the one in concession.
Redpilling you is not a concession on my part. FACT
Edit reason: SPELLING !
You don't need a corrupt judge to tank a case. Defendant can do it on their own just like AJ did, just like I have been saying from the beginning.
You can look up any dictionary to see what Kangaroo court is. No, its not about defendants throwing their own case.
Oh, and all the personal attacks just confirms to me that you are a sore loser. Thanks for that.
I took care to not make any 'attacking' statements as you could confirm if you gave it an honest review. If you find the shoe fits, good on you. You seem to now concede my assertions while countering your original position. After I showed your personal attack and asked you to move on, you like to bait me once again by aligning with my statements, yet pretend I'm wrong and providing no proofs. Period. Is that the way things should go here? If I couldn't handle it myself, I guess I could go crying to a moderator to stop baseless harassment.......oh......wait......
You embarrass yourself with it. Leading by example.