Candace Owens Getting Sued
(www.forbes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (87)
sorted by:
Sure, lead the way. Candace has multiple lawsuits. Lets take Brigitte Macron's lawsuit. Make your prediction and then I will make my prediction and we can see whose prediction will be close.
"Sure, I'll be a leader and do that......so.....go ahead.....lead the way".
Well since you're so brave and need fuel for your fire.....
Interesting you start with the Macron case. The charge would be slander. The burden of proof would be on the prosecution. What would be considered 'proof' from a foreign agent, when such proof would actually be classified? You KNOW it would. What if that gave license to misrepresent with a single doctored document? Would that determine the case? Would discovery for Candace be so limited as to determine nothing? Would classified info from a foreign player of the cabal be automatically allowed upon Candace's request? Would peripheral data and information be allowed as circumstantial evidence? Please detail each answer and be clear as to why. Let's 'debate' til your head spins.
Interesting that not only are you not man enough to state your position on the Macron case, you are already playing the advocate for Candace by coming up with a narrative in case it doesn't go the way you were hoping.
With this single sentence you have let it slip that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Explain to me why used the word would rather than is ?
Explain to me why you think the charge is slander?
Why slander? You actually had to ask that question? What was AJ's charge?
Tell me what charge you expect to be filed if not slander. Defamation? Same rules apply. Go ahead. Venture a charge:
Place your answer right here ___________.
Did you know that truth is a defense, but needs 'discovery' to find that truth.........and to deny it is to deny a legal defense?
Place answer here. _________
Will Candace be sued and she'll respond with discovery which will be allowed? Predict. Make a commitment or just shut the fuck up. Place answer here _____________.
I've had more productive conversations with dogs than I'm having here. So I'll continue providing facts and information you've never heard or considered, and you can continue simple denials and insults so we can show our proper place and relative standing.
Why would AJ sabotage his own discovery? Why would his team sabotage his case by allowing that to happen withOUT evidence discovered, and then hand over the defense in a phone? Answer here ________.
Why didn't AJ's team petition the judge for a mistrial? Why didn't AJ fire his team and ask for a mistrial/retrial?
Why would a judge allow that to happen in a high profile case that skews the outcome?
Answers here ______ here ____and here ______.
How does all this not add up to 'KANGAROO COURT' by arrangement? What is 2 plus 2? Answer here ______.
Thanks for playing......with your food.
One more personal insult gets you reported.
Leading by example.
Your turn, insult comedy dog. Answer the questions or stfu.
Another insult as point? You mistake my ability with words to be sign of physical weakness do you? You trained in MMA? Did you bounce in rough clubs as a youth? Huh. I can out 'man' you every day of the week, mentally and physically. I've proven the second part to many would be big-mouthed pretenders and it would be a pleasure to add you to the list. Now back to the 'debate' you're failing BIGLY.
You get to ignore my questions by asking me 'why'?
Let's revisit your very first response. You: "What is disallowed discovery phase?"
You FAIL to put your money where your projection hole is. Didn't you? What's the matter, skeered to stake your ego on a commitment. I gave you mine. I gave you a rundown on the reasons WHY the Macron case will never get to discovery IF it is even levied as a charge. I don't OWE you explanations, I gave them to you already and you pretend not.
Why is the charge slander? Holy cow. How else would they be able to keep Candace and others from spreading inconvenient accusations? Same reason for AJ. But AJ cooperated, being a shill.
Okay now on to the part where YOU, not I make your bold predictions on all cases pending or cried about.
What will happen smart guy? I'm still waiting with BAITED breath and you're the master baiter.
I certainly hope Erika Kirk tries to sue her. Just the resulting attention to details should be enough for them to discourage them. You'd know that and WHY only if you knew the details referenced. They're 'sensitive' to those can't sense the coffee.
What will happen? Will there be a trial? Will the burden of proof be on the prosecution to prove (to prove what) or on the defense to 'disprove' (kangaroo court)? Will she get legit discovery? Will it allow peripheral but related, and/or circumstantial, 'sensitive and classified' information? Be sure to detail your answers.
Here's 'my' position. NO Reasons to be explained unfortunately, in the near future. Kind of difficult to explain why something didn't happen, but it takes intellectual fortitude.
Come get some. Your turn