Apologies- couldn't resist the "11" dig at Omar.
I follow this blog (Lies are Unbekoming) on substack, mostly for solid anti-pharma, vax truther and other medical info. The author does extensive research, and is a little bit like A Midwestern Doctor (but easier to read imo) in terms of providing thorough documentation. In short, a solid researcher who is also a good writer.
Anyway, he wrote a book about how the Hiroshima atomic bombing was a hoax. This blog post obviously promotes the book, but it's more than a teaser, showing good info, states his competing theory, and states how he makes his case with enough data to continue your own search to verify if you are so inclined.
☢️ Here it is: https://open.substack.com/pub/unbekoming/p/the-nuclear-deception-2026
I haven't read the book, as 1) it just came out today and 2) I've already reached the same conclusion from other directions. But for truth-seekers I believe this will be a strong redpill, as he doesn't jump to conclusions lightly, and always makes a compelling case for his conclusions.
We'll get the truth eventually, and anons like Unbekoming are leading the way. A good one to follow.
Agreed that it's unbelievable because there is too much wrong here. There is a bunch of issues with the logic involved, and data not taken into account. I could probably write a book on how this book is beyond wrong. The physics is wrong (down right ignorant), the hospital is wrong because funnily enough it wasn't just blown out windows in the end, and i dunno about the medical signature but the post event radiation poisoning doesn't appear to be addressed at all.
My dad's dad, although not part of the enola gay crew, managed to get a photo of the event in question post hoc, having been stationed in the south pacific as part of the air force bomber command. The bomb was dropped, and there aren't many pics of it from the air, but I have one of them from that time.
The article reads like an advert - buy my book to find out the real story, but for something like this merely saying "there's war docs making this claim" isn't strong enough. I need to be able to read them. I've got hundreds of pages of my grandfather's flight history, enough to open a museum about the man (something I'm considering as he was a war hero in Korea where he died saving a cre of greenhorn, and was even called out to the roswell incident). This alternative scenario is apparently on record so show the records, or at least give us a citation ffs.
On the flip side, I took japanese as a kid. My teacher was a little old japanese woman, sweet as honey, who literally was like all japanese kids in the 40s - doing war drills up until those bombs fell. She told my class what that period was like, and how the Japanese who lived through it reacted. Most treat it as a moment of national shame, a period of extreme hubris that got two cities nearly wiped off the map.
Then there is the guy who lived through both bombings. Tsutomu Yamaguchi lived and worked in Nagasaki and was on a business trip with two colleagues, making their way back after a three month stint in Hiroshima. He saw the enola gay fly over, saw the first bomb flash, and suffered serious burns from the blast. He goes back home, and starts going back to work 3 days later 3km away from the upcoming fat man blast, looking like a mummy. He tells his supervisor what happened, and they struggle to comprehend it, until that same day fat man comes falling from the sky for both of them to see and experience from a good "safe" distance.
Now let's finally talk about the elephant in the room - the book seems to be indicating that no nukes have ever been made. "explosions need expanding gas and fission produces none" - what the actual fuck. It's comparison conventional bomb blasts to fission blasts. The hell? I studied chem and physics for years, and the amount of energy released by simple fission, let alone fusion like in an h bomb, beggars belief. It's pretty clear the guy seems to be working from a false premise. On top of that he compares reactors, devices using 3-5% enriched uranium as being the same chemically as bombs, which use 90% enriched uranium to achieve fission. Apple, meet orange.
Then there is the documented evidence of all the bloody testing we have done since then. It's not like we never dropped any more bombs. America has nuked itself far more than any other place, and most of our allies have dropped more nukes on us test sites than we ever dropped in war time.
Oh and Shima Hospital? Sure it "survived" along with a few similarly built buildings, although I quibble with how well it did out of the blast. it was about 1.5km from the epicenter, and was made of reinforced concrete unlike basically everything else nearby. It didn't survive unscathed though - the roof came off, the windows were blown out and it suffered massive scorching outside. There is a photo of it soon after the blast here
Sorry but I'm gonna need more than a trust me bro to believe this is remotely credible. Honestly I don't need to read his book to know I'm being told a fiction here, and I'm sure as hell not buying it when all the article has done is hijack my amygdala for the past couple hours to write this rebuttal.