Apologies- couldn't resist the "11" dig at Omar.
I follow this blog (Lies are Unbekoming) on substack, mostly for solid anti-pharma, vax truther and other medical info. The author does extensive research, and is a little bit like A Midwestern Doctor (but easier to read imo) in terms of providing thorough documentation. In short, a solid researcher who is also a good writer.
Anyway, he wrote a book about how the Hiroshima atomic bombing was a hoax. This blog post obviously promotes the book, but it's more than a teaser, showing good info, states his competing theory, and states how he makes his case with enough data to continue your own search to verify if you are so inclined.
☢️ Here it is: https://open.substack.com/pub/unbekoming/p/the-nuclear-deception-2026
I haven't read the book, as 1) it just came out today and 2) I've already reached the same conclusion from other directions. But for truth-seekers I believe this will be a strong redpill, as he doesn't jump to conclusions lightly, and always makes a compelling case for his conclusions.
We'll get the truth eventually, and anons like Unbekoming are leading the way. A good one to follow.
It's unbelievable because it is impossible. The reality exists. My father personally walked through the ruins of Nagasaki, a massive destruction accomplished with one bomber. The injuries of the survivors were distinctive to nuclear effects. Those who didn't survive were memorialized by flash shadows on still-standing walls. We had a foretaste with the test at Alamagordo. I have samples of trinitite, uniquely created by the flash of the blast, fusing the desert sand together. My career involved a Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information (CNWDI) clearance. I've studied the physics of nuclear reactions. It is the same process that runs in every nuclear reactor, which are profuse throughout the world. A nuclear detonation produces a distinctive dual-pulse flash in the atmosphere, for reasons resulting from the specific physics of the production of a plasma cloud. I worked in nuclear strategic defense at a prominent contractor of nuclear delivery systems, the Boeing Company (B-47, B-52, LGM-30 Minuteman ICBM, AGM-69 SRAM, and AGM-86 ALCM). Part of my specialization was understanding the weapon effects of a nuclear device in outer space (much different than in atmosphere). I was once in line to be read into an actual "Q clearance" for a nuclear weapon program, but the program was canceled.
And other nations have them. We know this by their demonstration. We have developed satellites (Vela) that are equipped to detect the distinctive dual-pulse flash of an air burst. They have been tested underground, detectable by seismograph. Air bursts and underground bursts can also be verified by aircraft carrying equipment to take air samples to detect tell-tale radioactive isotopes. A late colleague was a former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel responsible for digging out the test tunnels used for blast instrumentation. He died of cancerous effects resulting from the exposure to underground water containing tritium, a component of the fusion charge. Atomic espionage resulted in the conviction of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and their subsequent execution. Fake operations don't result in death sentences. Our first test of a thermonuclear weapon (Ivy Mike) vaporized the Pacific island of Elugelab (10.4 Megatons yield). Read that number. It would have taken 10.4 million tons of TNT to approximate that blast, infeasible to assemble. The people who think any of this could be faked have no understanding of the energy or physics involved. There is no reason that nations like Iran would be conducting serious programs in great secrecy to obtain a nuclear weapon if the whole subject was merely a mirage.
There is absolutely no conspiracy. You can read all about it in "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone and Dolan (1977), available from Amazon. (This includes details of the blast survivors.) Considerable unclassified technical information is available at www.nuclearweaponarchive.org. How can all this hard science be available if the whole subject is a fantasy?
I sampled the document provided at the link. It takes less than two pages to find that the authors have absolutely no understanding of the physics of a nuclear detonation, and what produces the radiation and the blast. And it is therefore clear they have not studied the readily available literature (mentioned above) to research the subject as due diligence before they commenced their rebuttal. So, it is sloppy rhetoric from the outset.
All this is hard information. Read and learn. Don't fall for a mythology dreamed up by ignorant advocates.