Yes, I actually READ THE ARTICLE THAT THE VIDEO IS TALKING ABOUT. I did not watch the video because I do not have time for it, literally look in the comments for the source that this video is based on. If what you're saying is what is in the video, the video MISREPRESENTED EVERYTHING. Please please please read the article listed here.
I stand corrected, anon. I listened to the video and read the accompanying TRANSCRIPT, not the article which I just saw OP had linked in a separate comment. When you said "read the source" I took it as the video-transcript. You're correct and thank you for your persistence.
The video mentions nothing of what I questioned you on so, yes, it appears the video "conveniently omitted" the nasty parts of the cited article.
I just want stuff like this to be in the public conscious, because it truly is abhorrent what judges and average people are able to do to destroy other's lives. And it's disingenuous for the video not to mention any of it!
It is disingenuous to "sanitize" what occurred with all this, agreed, but I suspect the podcaster wanted the focus firmly on the demon judge and only for his imposition of the stipulation that custody of those kids required they get jabbed and how that resulted in destroying the little boy's life. His gist here seems to be parental rights, judicial overreach and body sovereignty.
Also, the podcast guy may have based his video on information he saw about this incident which may not have included all the nasty divorce proceedings and sleazy lawyer maneuvers the article speaks of. I've seen too many households destroyed during marital problems where one or both parents use the kids as pawns. The children suffer and incidents like this one are heartbreaking.
Yes, I actually READ THE ARTICLE THAT THE VIDEO IS TALKING ABOUT. I did not watch the video because I do not have time for it, literally look in the comments for the source that this video is based on. If what you're saying is what is in the video, the video MISREPRESENTED EVERYTHING. Please please please read the article listed here.
I stand corrected, anon. I listened to the video and read the accompanying TRANSCRIPT, not the article which I just saw OP had linked in a separate comment. When you said "read the source" I took it as the video-transcript. You're correct and thank you for your persistence.
The video mentions nothing of what I questioned you on so, yes, it appears the video "conveniently omitted" the nasty parts of the cited article.
No problem, thank you for being kind about it!
I just want stuff like this to be in the public conscious, because it truly is abhorrent what judges and average people are able to do to destroy other's lives. And it's disingenuous for the video not to mention any of it!
It is disingenuous to "sanitize" what occurred with all this, agreed, but I suspect the podcaster wanted the focus firmly on the demon judge and only for his imposition of the stipulation that custody of those kids required they get jabbed and how that resulted in destroying the little boy's life. His gist here seems to be parental rights, judicial overreach and body sovereignty.
Also, the podcast guy may have based his video on information he saw about this incident which may not have included all the nasty divorce proceedings and sleazy lawyer maneuvers the article speaks of. I've seen too many households destroyed during marital problems where one or both parents use the kids as pawns. The children suffer and incidents like this one are heartbreaking.