But the way to build something great is not to chop people's heads off, or do the equivalent, or destroy their lives. It's to focus on creation, not destruction.
The problem with that philosophy is that it is much easier to destroy than it is to create. A single match can destroy a lifetime of creation.
People who threaten destruction must be taken out. Our enemies understand this very well.
The people who led us to this point need to be permanently removed from society. No, prison doesn't work. They can be pardoned if something goes wrong and we get another apparatchik in office.
The guillotine is quick and humane. Unlike hanging it doesn't fail allowing the condemned their freedom or a death by strangulation.
Although, I’ve read somewhere that the head maintains a few seconds of consciousness once it’s separated…and may still see and hear as it’s falling and rolling…
Wait. It is easier to destroy than to create.... so this is a problem with "the way to make things great is to create, rather than destroy"?
I don't see how this is a 'problem' - it almost sounds as if you're saying actually, "its better to take the path of destroying, because its easier...."
I'm guessing you mean "the challenge" rather than "the problem".
But perhaps you think that "the way to make things great is to create, rather than destroy" implies no accountability? But that's not inherent at all. 'Taking out' people who pursue destruction is valid, BUT the problem is, as we can see historically, this mentality can easily slip into vengeance or righteous terror.
There is a big difference between overcoming those who seek your destruction and pursuing destruction yourself.
Motive is the key here, and there also lies the difference between actual accountability and justice on one hand, and destructive pursuit of vengeance and death on the other.
I don't see how this is a 'problem' - it almost sounds as if you're saying actually, "its better to take the path of destroying, because its easier...."
That isn't what I am implying. There is an old adage "bad money drives out good." (Gresham's Law) That is how they are replacing us, with undesirables.
Banksters can tell you that it took them centuries to almost destroy us and that failed. Destruction takes a lot of effort, generational planning and control of money supply, because most humans left to their own devices simply go about their own lives
The problem with that philosophy is that it is much easier to destroy than it is to create. A single match can destroy a lifetime of creation.
People who threaten destruction must be taken out. Our enemies understand this very well.
Yes, creation is much better than destruction
The people who led us to this point need to be permanently removed from society. No, prison doesn't work. They can be pardoned if something goes wrong and we get another apparatchik in office.
The guillotine is quick and humane. Unlike hanging it doesn't fail allowing the condemned their freedom or a death by strangulation.
Cable ties are a lot cheaper.
Although, I’ve read somewhere that the head maintains a few seconds of consciousness once it’s separated…and may still see and hear as it’s falling and rolling…
Interesting concept…
I've read that as well, but it's still got to be better than being strangled to death because your neck didn't break.
Wait. It is easier to destroy than to create.... so this is a problem with "the way to make things great is to create, rather than destroy"?
I don't see how this is a 'problem' - it almost sounds as if you're saying actually, "its better to take the path of destroying, because its easier...."
I'm guessing you mean "the challenge" rather than "the problem".
But perhaps you think that "the way to make things great is to create, rather than destroy" implies no accountability? But that's not inherent at all. 'Taking out' people who pursue destruction is valid, BUT the problem is, as we can see historically, this mentality can easily slip into vengeance or righteous terror.
There is a big difference between overcoming those who seek your destruction and pursuing destruction yourself.
Motive is the key here, and there also lies the difference between actual accountability and justice on one hand, and destructive pursuit of vengeance and death on the other.
That isn't what I am implying. There is an old adage "bad money drives out good." (Gresham's Law) That is how they are replacing us, with undesirables.
Creating is all well and good if you can keep it.
Banksters can tell you that it took them centuries to almost destroy us and that failed. Destruction takes a lot of effort, generational planning and control of money supply, because most humans left to their own devices simply go about their own lives