I would suspect if there was something really there with Branson, a good dig and solid research would turn it up.
I am mindful, however, of Donald J Trump. Many people simply wrote him off because he was another of "that class" aka billionaire capitalist.
I tend to think that the world is a bit like a big pool, and while we have the cabal system (bankers, etc) dominating and ruling over the pool, it's still a place in which God's principles operate, and so, when people apply operation of those principles, they can make something of themselves. Not everyone or everything is corrupted, either black or white.
knighted, Nobel Prize
From personal experience, I know that international organizations (esp. NGOs) can operate by trying to bring people into their sphere, to use them, gain prestige from them, or legitimacy. Think WEF "young leaders" program. Not everyone who took them at face value (and participated on some level) is a Schwab protegee or asset. Indeed, many of those included in the designation as 'Young Leaders" were included unilaterally by WEF, ostensibly to try to rope them in.
The Nobel Prize committee, Whoever controls the Royalty knighthoods, etc, would be the same. I do NOT believe they are innocent or that we can take them at face value (aka they are part of the corrupt establishment) but also, I cannot assume that everyone they attach to or assign 'awards' to is corrupt.
Plenty of side eye, BUT I'm also willing to entertain the possibility that Branson, for example, is simply what he appears to be. Some folks, however, would not. They look at Branson, even the data we have here (including what you've provided, which is salient) and simply conclude, "Told you. He's scum." without ever considering other possibilities.
a lot of verification is needed for a lot of big claims
Should be a banner at the top of GAW (jks, not really, but its true!)
It’s perfectly fine to be prompted by tweets, but Step 2 should never be “blindly accept claims, emote about them. and move on”.
Thanks AE.
I would suspect if there was something really there with Branson, a good dig and solid research would turn it up.
I am mindful, however, of Donald J Trump. Many people simply wrote him off because he was another of "that class" aka billionaire capitalist.
I tend to think that the world is a bit like a big pool, and while we have the cabal system (bankers, etc) dominating and ruling over the pool, it's still a place in which God's principles operate, and so, when people apply operation of those principles, they can make something of themselves. Not everyone or everything is corrupted, either black or white.
From personal experience, I know that international organizations (esp. NGOs) can operate by trying to bring people into their sphere, to use them, gain prestige from them, or legitimacy. Think WEF "young leaders" program. Not everyone who took them at face value (and participated on some level) is a Schwab protegee or asset. Indeed, many of those included in the designation as 'Young Leaders" were included unilaterally by WEF, ostensibly to try to rope them in.
The Nobel Prize committee, Whoever controls the Royalty knighthoods, etc, would be the same. I do NOT believe they are innocent or that we can take them at face value (aka they are part of the corrupt establishment) but also, I cannot assume that everyone they attach to or assign 'awards' to is corrupt.
Plenty of side eye, BUT I'm also willing to entertain the possibility that Branson, for example, is simply what he appears to be. Some folks, however, would not. They look at Branson, even the data we have here (including what you've provided, which is salient) and simply conclude, "Told you. He's scum." without ever considering other possibilities.
Should be a banner at the top of GAW (jks, not really, but its true!)
So, so true. Thanks for saying it so well.
Extremely good points, all.