Not a surprise, but here's some actual data about what CEOs are planning.
https://gizmodo.com/the-young-are-being-battered-by-ai-as-hiring-shifts-to-older-workers-2000759608
Job prospects for early-career workers took a turn for the worse last year.
In the first quarter of the year, the job market for 22-to-27-year-olds “deteriorated noticeably,” according to a New York Fed report. Later, Fed Chair Jerome Powell admitted that AI might be partly to blame. Companies that would have ordinarily hired recent graduates are now increasingly trying to have AI assistants automate that work, Powell explained. By the end of the year, the job market for these young workers was at its harshest since the worst days of the pandemic.
Now, a global survey of CEOs by consulting firm Oliver Wyman indicates that things could get even worse over the next two years.
According to the survey, the share of CEOs saying that they were looking to reduce junior roles over the next year or two doubled to 43% from 17% just last year. Only 17% of CEOs said they are shifting hiring to focus on more junior positions.
Instead of young workers, executives are increasingly focusing on hiring older workers. Roughly 30% of respondents said they are shifting hiring to more mid-level roles, up from only 10% last year.
The change is AI-driven, the report concludes.
“Notably, the CEOs with the longest planning horizons are the most likely to plan headcount reductions,” the report said. “That suggests they expect a structurally leaner organization not as a cost measure but as the destination — the endpoint of an AI-augmented operating model that requires fewer people, deployed differently.”
(more)
Maybe others in IT can back me up, but there's still a plethora of legacy equipment and software out there that, for whatever reason, isn't, can't, or won't be moved to the "cloud" and can't be AI-ified because nobody knows how it works to tell AI how to redesign it.
It really doesn't make sense for the next generation to learn how to maintain these systems, as most will get phased out eventually - usually it's a question of getting funding, TBH.
May as well let us oldsters take care of that stuff since we know it and as it gets retired out of service, so will we to a certain extent.
In my job, I spend half my time with Salesforce administration, and half trying to keep an old IBM i-Series with outdated software from dying before we can migrate the customers into the newer systems. When I was hired on six years ago, i was told that old system was going to be gone "in about a year". Five years later, and it's still going to be gone "in about a year". For perspective, I could retire in less than four years...
I am a software engineer.
I hear you.