Over the last decade, a ton of people have gone up against Trump, and Trump has always prevailed. There is a reason for this, and Anons know why.
Yet many Anons were starting to think that we will be screwed in midterms because Trump waged "unpopular" war in Iran, "supports" Israel, etc etc.
If anyone could have proven Trump wrong, it was Massie. If anyone could have driven a wedge and divided MAGA, it was Massie, because he made simplistic claims that appealed to people on the right who weren't paying close attention to the 5D chess being played.
And he lost.
With that he proved that MAGA train has no breaks, and the Midterms will be blazing MAGA RED and all the controlled oppositions will be thrown on the kerb.
NCSWIC!
I'm still trying to understand how these data centers (AI) make money for the builders/keepers of them. Is monitoring online activity really worth all that is involved with construction of a data center, and running the center? Maybe the average Joes (and Josephines) are highly influenced by the constant barrage of ads directed at them via AI, resulting in purchases consistent with that barrage. I personally don't feel I buy anything based on some background AI activity. Can someone explain how this AI saturation is actually profitable?
For one, it cuts down on labor costs because youβre not having to pay a human to make graphics, provide voiceover material for commercials, copy edit, etc.
In terms of how valuable your data is, Datapods calculated it about $263 a person back in 2023. The real worth of data harvesting, as I was taught in my behavioral marketing classes, is that you get specific data on specific audiences and can fine tune how you target them with advertisements.