Infiltration, not invasion
The expression "infiltration" appears some 35 times in roughly 32 Q drops.
4373 INFILTRATION V INVASION
4416 Infiltration instead of invasion
4699 Infiltration not invasion
1751 .... tactic of infiltration and internal disruption is being deployed on this board....
How does infiltration work?
First step: Behave exactly as the indigenous community does. Say the same things, act the same way, earn trust.
Do this large scale, with many infiltrators across the whole spectrum.
Second step: gradually, in a strategic manner, at opportune times, mobilize assets so that the desired actions emerge as if in an organic development.
Third step: drop hammer/ in psyops, recruit / swing popular community opinions towards desired outcome.
This strategy was used against all of America over decades. But did you think that when this was exposed (Q) and resistance was mounted (MAGA), that the Enemy would simply lie down and give up?
Premise
Once the impact of the Q-operation and the rise of MAGA became evident, the enemy shifted tactics and began a long term project of infiltrating a) the Q community (The Great Awakening community/truth seekers/conspiracy theorists) and b) MAGA, the 'conservative' based for Trump.
Began during the first administration, but reactivated once it became clear that impeachment, lawfare, etc, would NOT stop Trump from coming back.
Key factors
One, infiltration over time, gain trust, gain following and influence.
Two, stealth.
Three, activate in variable manner, not all at once, appear organic.
Four: sow distrust, sow doubts, attack emotional and intellectual pillars of target audience
Conclusion: psyop designed to promote desired narratives, destroy target.
(MAGA is dead, MAGA is conflicted, Trump has changed, Trump is controlled, etc.)
Stages
Stages 1, 2, 3.
Stage 1: Early outliers like A. Jones, Fuentes, Ian Carroll, etc.
Stage 2: Growth activists like Ian Carroll, Candace Owens, MTG, etc.
Stage 3: Heavy artillery: Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly,
Broad Ecosphere of Deployment
Notice the variety of target audiences, all somehow within the 'conservative to patriotic to awake'.
Some assets target primarily patriotic people, some target people searching for 'truth', some assets target the traditionally conservative, normie types. etc.
Use different core, emotional themes to mobilize sentiment: (choose one): The Joos (serving Israel), The Epstein file (Pedo-protector, anti-child), Evil Target (Erika Kirk, etc)
In this way, by building a broad ecosystem of infiltrating influencers, the impression of an organic wave of X sentiment can be created, with the purpose of bringing in and persuading otherwise well-intentioned (Trump) supporters.
Conclusion
The very same tactics that were used to infiltrate and undermine America to the brink of destruction have been mobilized against the Q / Truther movement and the MAGA base, for several years now, reaching their culmination at this time.
When only looking at one, two or three of the various infiltration assets, appearances might look natural and may convince you (target audience) in some part.
However, when one removes oneself emotionally and narrative from the action zone (i.e. stepping back to take the 10,000 ft view), the timeline, the direction, plus the coordination that appears over time + direction reveal the plan and method of attack; it becomes a lot more more obvious.
NB: This post designed as a brief, point-based overview of the premise. Details naturally omitted for brevity.
Success?
PS. Looking at how successful Trump endorsed candidates are in recent primaries, etc, it certainly looks like the infiltration psyop has NOT been as successful as they would like it to be. Aka: it failed.
PPS. But, elections and primaries are rigged!!!!
Well, actually, over the past 1.5 years, on the basis of the pre-Trump 2.0 period (2016 - 2024), the pathways for democrats and RINOs to rig the outcomes have been systematically undercut: funding (Act Blue, USAID, etc), exposure of corruption, and so forth.
"I love it when a good plan comes together... " ~ Hannibal Smith
"Nothing can stop what is coming" ~ some LARP on the interwebs
Infiltrating the alt-media sphere and the new centers of influence over the threat: the awakened truth-seekers and the MAGA patriotic base. Without both of these Trump would not be able to do what he has been and is doing. Ultimately, whatever Trump accomplishes, it all boils down to the People. Will the People open their eyes, will they take responsibility for the Country, and throw off the forces that have targeted the nation?
It has always been about one thing: STOP TRUMP. Trump is THE existential threat, both to their system (globalism, banker cartel, world domination) and to their control over the population at large.
People's emotions and thought processes. Turn people against Trump. It's not about having to agree with Trump, on all things, on everything, at all. It's about whether Trump is supported and empowered or hamstrung, blocked, and made ineffective. It's about the post-Trump era, too. So they want to try to wait him out and then restart their operations to a) control the people and b) control the system.
Exactly, and that is the crux of the problem. Because there are people who support Trump simply because they are 'Pro-Trump' i.e. people who voted for Trump simply because he was 'the Republican candidate'. i.e. they would vote for whoever had the R-ticket. Or because Trump is delivering something they want - cheaper oil, etc. Or what have you.
But for others, the reason to support Trump is because he is pursuing certain objectives that are underpinned by certain principles (values). Because Trump is pursuing them, THAT'S the reason to support Donald Trump.
And if inflooencers can convince people that somehow, he is NOT pursuing those values and principles, they can turn people away from him.
Think of the situation in terms of scriptural precedent. Moses lead the people out of Egypt. But at a crucial moment, when he was fasting to recieve the word of God that would direct Israel until the time that God would sender Christ, whispers were spread and in the end, Aaron led the people to revolt against Moses. It wasn't just a revolt against God. It was a revolt against believing in Moses, who he was, who had sent him, and what he was doing.
That lack of faith triggered the lose of the first tablets, ultimately causing the 40-year prolongation of the path the Canaan (it should have been possible to get there in less than 2 years, certainly, but it was extended to a 40-year process) and the loss of the entire first generation of Israelites.
People should support Trump, and have faith in him and God, but they should also know WHY they should support him, and what he is actually doing. Otherwise, they are susceptible to the Aaron syndrome, lets call it.
Whether Tucker for example, is just plain wrong and stupid, or an asset, the result is the same: cause people to turn their backs on Trump.
Personally, I think Tucker fits the profile of an asset deployed. Infiltration.
And <rant> I think its plain dumb if people who are supposedly awake think that after the power of the MAGA base and the emerging truth seeker community became blatantly obvious, that the forces that conducted psyops on the world for many decades is just going to ignore that sector and NOT try to infiltrate it. I think too many people simply underestimate the magnitude or nature of the operation to STOP TRUMP. <end rant>
I think it’s deeper than that. They’re trying to infiltrate a bulwark against the values that MAGA is pushing. Alt-media is just one angle of attack to attempt it.
That counterattack is where this comes into play:
Our values are indeed not simply stupid things like cheaper oil. They aren’t even more important things like jeorbs.
IMHO, our values will end up being biblical, from God himself, and if we follow them, we make it, and if we don’t… there is grace, and repentance is an important component of grace.
So then the question shifts to things like, “repent of what?” “Sin.” “Well, what is sin?” “Not obeying the Will of God.” “Yes, but specifically?”
We have a long way to go to start answering that last one…. Even people that seem to have some grasp on different aspects of it are still in refinement.
I know I’m not there yet.
Matthew 26:41 - Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed [is] willing, but the flesh [is] weak.
Sin is not really that hard to define. What's hard to define is the part that comes before sin.
Just like a physician cannot diagnose (or treat) a patient unless he has a pre-existing definition of health - what is the healthy state of which the disease is a diversion from - it's hard to define sin when we are not clear about what is the real, non-sin state.
I take the perspective that everything in God's creation functions according to the principle of give and receive action. Give and receive action is reciprocal in nature and underlies all productive relationships in God's universe. All relationship can be reduced ultimately to two aspects or partners interacting according to the principle of give and receive action.
One partner or aspect is the initiating aspect. It gives. We could call that the core initiator of the relationship, or subject (like a ruler). The other aspect is the responding aspect, like an object to the ruler. It receives what is given, completing the interaction. Responsive 'reflector'.
Examples: God gives us love. We receive. God gives us his Word. We receive. Our mind gives instructions to our body. It receives those instructions and responds. A teacher gives instruction to his pupils, the pupils respond and learn. This works on all levels of God's creation. A CEO is the subject, the employees, the objects. Together, they form the business. Male and female, etc.
But that's just one dimension. Once the object receives and stands in a receptive position to the subject initiator, it can reciprocate by returning something to the subject, which the subject itself can then receive and then so on. This creates a completed relationship where giving and receive are both taking place between the original initiating subject and the receptive object.
That dynamic of give and receive generates energy, all the energy required for existence, for action, and for multiplication. The relationship fulfills and advances the purpose or intent of the initiating subject. It moves in that direction.
Stick with me, I'm getting there...
So, what is the fall? When Lucifer, instead of being an object to God, made himself an initiating subject in his own right, and then induced Eve and Adam to a) cutoff their relationship with God (disbelieving in God's command) and b) unite with him in his intent and purpose (eating the fruit together).
Thus, all destructive conflicts in the fallen world come about when the proper initiating subject is met not with receptivity by what should be the proper responding object. Under Satan's influence, our body resists our mind and tries to direct the mind according to its desires, above and beyond the proper desires of the heart and mind. A subject initiator is like a (+), the receptive object like a (-). But in the fallen realm, the (-) becomes a (+) as well, and conflicts with the original (+). So, they repel each other, instead of cooperating. That's exactly why, as Paul said, "with my mind I serve the law of God, but with my body, I serve the law of sin". Two (+)s, one proper, the other in a position that usurps that proper position of the original (+) to stand as a (+) itself.
e.g. A man driven by lust will do unprincipled actions because he allows his body to dominate, instead of his God-given mind.
A key point here is that the positions of subject or object are reciprocal, and when they are united correctly, then the responding object can stand in a position of initiator and the initiator stand in the position of responding object. because they have already united centering on the common purpose provided by the initiator. So, the relationship is truly reciprocal. Love is given, receive, and then love is given back, and received. In the unity, they become one. United + and -, they then together form a new + as a new unit or aspect. A man and woman come together, and united, they become the new +, have children, and then relate the to children who stand as responsive objects.
So then, what exactly is sin? Sin is when any person responds to satanic direction, whether given from the spiritual dimension, or via another human, and then receiving that, accepts it, and responds, and then moves forward the satanic purpose and will behind it.
A man walks down the street. He is tempted by a satanic impulse coming from a bad spirit. He steals. He receives the satanic impulse to act (in a way that contradicts God's purpose), and executes it with his body. His mind is the (-) to the bad spirit (who in the end is an agent of Satan) which is the (+), and then his body becomes the (-) to his satanically inspired mind (+).
Lying at the bedrock of sin is this dynamic. When we form a reciprocal relationship with Satan, via one of Satan's minions or instruments (whether they are willing or ignorant), we sin. Satan initiates, we respond. That's sin.
Consider the Temptation of Christ. Satan tried three times to initiate a respond from Christ in a relationship with Satan was the imitating subject whose purpose he wanted Christ to submit to. In response, Christ affirmed that only God is the true (+), by quoting God's word and principles, and that Christ is untied with the Father as the true (+), to whom the Son is the true (-). By the third temptation, Christ had proven his unity with the Father, and as such, together the Father and Son formed a new (+) in front of which Satan (opposing (+) had no place to stand. So, defeated, Satan departed.
Defeated by Christ, Satan then targeted the Jewish people, to be a (+) to them (-) and eventually get them to unite with him to form a greater (+) that could attack Christ. Meanwhile Jesus preached in order to wake up the Jewish people and have them form a (-) to him, through love and faith.
The victory of the cross is that when confronted with the faithlessness of the people (-), showing that they had united enough with Satan (+), Christ then sacrificed himself willingly. He could have walked away, but instead, he gave his flesh (-) as a ransom to open the door to free the hearts and minds (+) of all men and women.
The reason God prepared the Israelites for 2000 years was that so when the true (+) appeared, they would recognize and respond, as a true (-). The tragedy is that due to constant failure, sin, constantly making small conditions in which they responded to and united with, as (-) the impulses and temptations from Satan (false +), they failed, as Jesus indicates in the parable of the wicked tenants.
The challenge is to be able to identify whether an impulse comes from Satan (i.e. via lies, or via misplaced impulses) and then to resist it, but instead respond always to God, our Father, through Christ, who is the True (+) for humankind.
In conclusion, Sin is the condition by which we establish a give and receive relationship with Satan by our standing in the position of receptive object to him, instead of rejecting him and standing in the position of receptive object to God, the Father.
That's how I understand it. The interesting thing here is, well, what is the true or original nature of give and receive relationships? That's what we need to understand before we can accurately diagnose sin, or define it.
PS. It is NOT the action itself that defines the sin. It's WHO initiates it. God, or Satan.
Ay! It’s the Golden Corral of comment responses! Gonna take a few reads to digest all that.
Very interesting point! “Sadducees take note.”