Probably not. The natural composition of a chemical, occuring in natural amounts, on a natural frequency of release IS NOT the same as an artificially recomposited, distributed, and concentrated release.
I don't see how you can prove that. Elsewhere on this page I went through the numbers, and there is far more SO2 in the atmosphere than any human means can deposit in a "concentrated" form. Gases immediately dissipate by dilution into the surrounding atmosphere, and SO2 does nothing of interest (as I witnessed from living in the neighborhood of a large local source). But you are breathing it right now, at 15 parts per billion concentration, completely harmless and unnoticeable.
But what you need is an AB test and we don't have an AV test meaning what are the levels in existence pre World War II or the start of you engineering. And what naturally occurred in the atmosphere. Secondly it does not automatically dissipate in the atmosphere or the trails wouldn't be lasting for hours upon hours upon hours which they do. And you cannot actually say it's completely harmless and unnoticeable. You would have to compare it to the rise of any other disease and affliction that has happened since the start of you engineering to correlate the data. That is like saying Plastics are perfectly harmless as Plastics are on their surface perfectly harmless however microplastics are not using that as an example. There was no crossing of the blood-brain barrier for microplastics before an accumulation of data. So you're taking a hey you're breathing it in right now and it's harmless as if that's the result of whether it is harmless or not there are things called cumulative effects and cumulative diseases.
Contrails are ice crystals and are a form of high altitude cloud. If the relative humidity is high, they will persist, just like the clouds. They are not sulfur dioxide, which is a gas, which dissipates rapidly by diffusion into the atmosphere. It is a common feature of volcanic eruptions and emissions, which we have known about for centuries.
Yes, I can say it is completely harmless and unnoticeable at a concentration of 15 parts per billion, which is the average composition of the atmosphere. (You obviously don't notice it.) I have lived in an environment of high concentration and, while it is unpleasant, there were no lasting effects on anyone or anything living. What I am saying is backed up by a lifetime of experience, and the lifetimes of others also living in the same world. It is pretty clear you have not researched the subject. It is the old story: ignorance => paranoia.
Plastics and inorganic natural compounds are far different from each other, and no proper analogy can be drawn. The devil is in the details.
Look, relax. We survive in the midst of plenty of volcanic emissions. Human production is about 4 times that, and still no problem. The bogeyman of acid rain was dispelled by proper research. Whole industries are built around the production of sulfuric acid, for which this is a precursor product. We understand it thoroughly. Every lit match produces sulfur dioxide, and we don't freak out about lighting matches.
Why does it rain usually within. 24 hours after these planes finish hashtagging the sky? Why don't I have crickets or fireflies and a huge reduction of birds in my forest? What effect does turning sunny blue skies into gray skies have on the human psyche?
Memorial day is tomorrow. I turned on the heat yesterday. This rainy, cold spring is affecting crops.
The FAA needs to get involved. Those airplanes need flight clearances.
AND WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXPERIMENT? (caps intended)
Probably not. The natural composition of a chemical, occuring in natural amounts, on a natural frequency of release IS NOT the same as an artificially recomposited, distributed, and concentrated release.
I don't see how you can prove that. Elsewhere on this page I went through the numbers, and there is far more SO2 in the atmosphere than any human means can deposit in a "concentrated" form. Gases immediately dissipate by dilution into the surrounding atmosphere, and SO2 does nothing of interest (as I witnessed from living in the neighborhood of a large local source). But you are breathing it right now, at 15 parts per billion concentration, completely harmless and unnoticeable.
But what you need is an AB test and we don't have an AV test meaning what are the levels in existence pre World War II or the start of you engineering. And what naturally occurred in the atmosphere. Secondly it does not automatically dissipate in the atmosphere or the trails wouldn't be lasting for hours upon hours upon hours which they do. And you cannot actually say it's completely harmless and unnoticeable. You would have to compare it to the rise of any other disease and affliction that has happened since the start of you engineering to correlate the data. That is like saying Plastics are perfectly harmless as Plastics are on their surface perfectly harmless however microplastics are not using that as an example. There was no crossing of the blood-brain barrier for microplastics before an accumulation of data. So you're taking a hey you're breathing it in right now and it's harmless as if that's the result of whether it is harmless or not there are things called cumulative effects and cumulative diseases.
Contrails are ice crystals and are a form of high altitude cloud. If the relative humidity is high, they will persist, just like the clouds. They are not sulfur dioxide, which is a gas, which dissipates rapidly by diffusion into the atmosphere. It is a common feature of volcanic eruptions and emissions, which we have known about for centuries.
Yes, I can say it is completely harmless and unnoticeable at a concentration of 15 parts per billion, which is the average composition of the atmosphere. (You obviously don't notice it.) I have lived in an environment of high concentration and, while it is unpleasant, there were no lasting effects on anyone or anything living. What I am saying is backed up by a lifetime of experience, and the lifetimes of others also living in the same world. It is pretty clear you have not researched the subject. It is the old story: ignorance => paranoia.
Plastics and inorganic natural compounds are far different from each other, and no proper analogy can be drawn. The devil is in the details.
Look, relax. We survive in the midst of plenty of volcanic emissions. Human production is about 4 times that, and still no problem. The bogeyman of acid rain was dispelled by proper research. Whole industries are built around the production of sulfuric acid, for which this is a precursor product. We understand it thoroughly. Every lit match produces sulfur dioxide, and we don't freak out about lighting matches.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASsdr7P0O/end-darpa/c/
Why does it rain usually within. 24 hours after these planes finish hashtagging the sky? Why don't I have crickets or fireflies and a huge reduction of birds in my forest? What effect does turning sunny blue skies into gray skies have on the human psyche?
Memorial day is tomorrow. I turned on the heat yesterday. This rainy, cold spring is affecting crops.
The FAA needs to get involved. Those airplanes need flight clearances.
AND WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXPERIMENT? (caps intended)