Well, I encountered the Oz books in grade school when I was less than 10 years old and I enjoyed reading them. They were in the school library. Other children read them. Why do you go on about a "high school education" when it was a children's story?
Are you aware that most children's stories are fantasy? Did you never read "The Wind in the Willows" (1908) as a child? Or Peter Pan (1911)? Or "Treasure Island" (1883)? I'm sorry to tell you that none of this was high school material.
I encountered the Oz books in grade school when I was less than 10 years old and I enjoyed reading them.
Were you 10 in 1900? Or even 1939? What is the context of what I was exposing? Can you transfer your context to a context decades earlier and assume they have the same meaning in a broader conversation? Are you aware of how much changed in the decades in between. all the social engineering, the population demographics, the education demographics, and who paid for it and controlled it and how?
Why do you go on about a "high school education" when it was a children's story?
By itself not a lot. In the entire context of my exposition and argument a great deal. I was talking about how information is controlled, and how using the MOVIE, The Wizard of Oz, hid the truth through pushing that truth through fiction, a deliberate program of mind control. Those programs were controlled by the exact same people who created the movie (at the exact same time) as similar mind control programs. The same people that controlled the systems and the narratives related to the 1930s (and 1920s, and 1910s, etc., etc.) Banker Cabal systems (including the Versailles treaty, the German banking systems failure and rebuild, the Bank of International Settlements), the WWII narrative and the world wide Eugenics programs (and who really paid for the Nazis and their programs), not to mention "anti" Jewish narratives (lost to time, but are very meaningful if you dig).
Are you aware that most children's stories are fantasy?
I feel like you probably didn't actually listen to what I was saying. Your response is purely a strawman and says pretty much nothing about anything relevant (that I was talking about) at all.
Your point was focused on this being high-school reading matter. My point is that it was grade-school reading matter. Books were books. The story predates the Federal Reserve, and L. Frank Baum was not interested in polemics.
The movie followed the plot of the book, so nothing new emerges from the movie. If it did for you, you are the only one. I guess it was so obvious, no one else saw it.
Your point was focused on this being high-school reading matter.
Which is exactly why I think you didn't actually read what I wrote at all. My point (a partial point, the part related to the book in 1900) was about how the book had almost nothing thing to do with the EFFECT of the movie, and how the movie was used to create a false belief system through controlled opposition, using the truth.
so nothing new emerges from the movie
What changed was the scope. It was the SCOPE that changed everything. The book was something obscure, but the movie (and its hidden truths about the banking system that rules the world) was pushed across the world, bigger than any other venue of all time (at the time). It used the truth, and the direct evidence of that truth, turning it into fiction, constructing a false subliminal belief system through directly connected (from the OSS) mind control programs.
If you wish to attempt to "rebut" my argument, at least make an honest attempt to read what a person is saying instead of crafting false strawmen arguments on points that aren't even on either the main topic or the associated subtopics.
The book provided the story and script for the movie. There were no differences between them in plot or characters. And it was a popular book...for children, not for high-school students.
The film was released in 1939 (obviously written and produced beforehand). The OSS wasn't created until 1942. Time travel doesn't exist. The only message the audience walked out with was "There's no place like home."
Well, I encountered the Oz books in grade school when I was less than 10 years old and I enjoyed reading them. They were in the school library. Other children read them. Why do you go on about a "high school education" when it was a children's story?
Are you aware that most children's stories are fantasy? Did you never read "The Wind in the Willows" (1908) as a child? Or Peter Pan (1911)? Or "Treasure Island" (1883)? I'm sorry to tell you that none of this was high school material.
Were you 10 in 1900? Or even 1939? What is the context of what I was exposing? Can you transfer your context to a context decades earlier and assume they have the same meaning in a broader conversation? Are you aware of how much changed in the decades in between. all the social engineering, the population demographics, the education demographics, and who paid for it and controlled it and how?
By itself not a lot. In the entire context of my exposition and argument a great deal. I was talking about how information is controlled, and how using the MOVIE, The Wizard of Oz, hid the truth through pushing that truth through fiction, a deliberate program of mind control. Those programs were controlled by the exact same people who created the movie (at the exact same time) as similar mind control programs. The same people that controlled the systems and the narratives related to the 1930s (and 1920s, and 1910s, etc., etc.) Banker Cabal systems (including the Versailles treaty, the German banking systems failure and rebuild, the Bank of International Settlements), the WWII narrative and the world wide Eugenics programs (and who really paid for the Nazis and their programs), not to mention "anti" Jewish narratives (lost to time, but are very meaningful if you dig).
I feel like you probably didn't actually listen to what I was saying. Your response is purely a strawman and says pretty much nothing about anything relevant (that I was talking about) at all.
Your point was focused on this being high-school reading matter. My point is that it was grade-school reading matter. Books were books. The story predates the Federal Reserve, and L. Frank Baum was not interested in polemics.
The movie followed the plot of the book, so nothing new emerges from the movie. If it did for you, you are the only one. I guess it was so obvious, no one else saw it.
Which is exactly why I think you didn't actually read what I wrote at all. My point (a partial point, the part related to the book in 1900) was about how the book had almost nothing thing to do with the EFFECT of the movie, and how the movie was used to create a false belief system through controlled opposition, using the truth.
What changed was the scope. It was the SCOPE that changed everything. The book was something obscure, but the movie (and its hidden truths about the banking system that rules the world) was pushed across the world, bigger than any other venue of all time (at the time). It used the truth, and the direct evidence of that truth, turning it into fiction, constructing a false subliminal belief system through directly connected (from the OSS) mind control programs.
If you wish to attempt to "rebut" my argument, at least make an honest attempt to read what a person is saying instead of crafting false strawmen arguments on points that aren't even on either the main topic or the associated subtopics.
The book provided the story and script for the movie. There were no differences between them in plot or characters. And it was a popular book...for children, not for high-school students.
The film was released in 1939 (obviously written and produced beforehand). The OSS wasn't created until 1942. Time travel doesn't exist. The only message the audience walked out with was "There's no place like home."
I will stop with this and wish you a good Sunday.