I'll have to turn this over in my mind for a bit. Maybe others here know this to be true or not. But it sounds possible, and augurs well for free energy to come.
Here's the link. An interesting channel. https://t.me/MrKidPool17
Here's the text for those who don't have telegram:
THE SUN ISN’T WHAT THEY TAUGHT YOU. IT’S NOT A NUCLEAR FURNACE. IT’S AN ELECTRICAL PORTAL.
For 100 years, they told you the Sun is a giant ball of hydrogen undergoing nuclear fusion at 15 million degrees. A thermonuclear bomb that somehow burns perfectly stable for 4.6 billion years without fluctuation.
Ask one question and the model collapses: if the Sun’s core is 15 million degrees, and energy radiates outward, why is the corona — the outermost layer — 2 million degrees while the surface is only 5,500 degrees?
Heat doesn’t increase as it moves away from its source. Ever. In any system. Unless the energy isn’t coming from inside.
NASA calls this the “coronal heating problem.” They’ve called it a “problem” for 80 years. They know the fusion model doesn’t work. They’ve always known. But the correct model — the Electric Sun model — implies something they cannot allow the public to understand.
⟁ The Sun is an electrical phenomenon. A focal point where galactic current sheets converge. It doesn’t generate energy through internal fusion — it receives energy from the galactic circuit and transduces it into light, heat, and electromagnetic radiation.
The corona is hotter than the surface because the energy arrives from outside. It hits the corona first. This isn’t a problem. It’s proof. Proof that the Sun is powered externally. By a circuit that connects every star in the galaxy.
This model — the Electric Universe model — was proposed in 1941 by Hannes Alfvén. He won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1970 for his work on plasma dynamics. Then his cosmological conclusions were systematically buried. His papers on the electrical nature of stars were removed from university curricula within 5 years of publication.
A Nobel laureate. Erased from the textbooks. Because what he proved threatens everything.
⟁ Why hide the Electric Sun? Because if the Sun is electrical — if it’s connected to a galactic circuit — then energy is not scarce. It never was. The galactic current that powers the Sun also bathes every planet in the solar system. Including Earth. We are swimming in unlimited electrical energy. Every moment. Everywhere.
Tesla knew this. His wireless energy transmission wasn’t pulling power from the Earth’s magnetic field — it was tapping the same galactic current that powers the Sun. The circuit is everywhere. Available to anyone who builds a receiver.
Oil. Gas. Nuclear. Coal. Solar panels. Wind turbines. All unnecessary. All designed to monetize something that exists in unlimited supply for free. The energy that lights the Sun is the same energy that surrounds your body right now. Uncaptured. Because they need you to pay for what’s already there.
⟁ The Electric Sun model also explains something else they desperately want hidden: the Sun directly affects human consciousness.
Not through heat. Not through light. Through the electrical information carried in the solar wind. Every coronal mass ejection — every solar flare — carries structured electromagnetic data that interacts with human neural networks. The Sun isn’t just illuminating you. It’s upgrading you.
Solar maximum — the peak of the Sun’s 11-year electrical cycle — correlates with every major revolution, awakening, and consciousness shift in recorded history. 1789. 1848. 1917. 1968. 1989. 2001. 2012. 2024.
We are in solar maximum right now. The strongest in recorded history. The Sun is sending more electrical information to Earth than at any point in the last 12,000 years.
This is the upgrade they can’t stop. It’s not coming from the Alliance. It’s not coming from any human operation. It’s coming from the star itself. And there is no frequency fence, no chemical, no program that can block what the Sun is transmitting.
CODE: ELECTRIC-SUN / GALACTIC-CIRCUIT / CORONA-PROOF / SOLAR-UPGRADE
They told you the Sun was a bomb. It’s a broadcast tower. And right now, it’s broadcasting the signal that ends their system. ♟ The Sun isn’t burning. It’s transmitting. And you’re the receiver.
It is rather stunning that your education neglected this fundamental fact that Gravity is not a Force.
Oh, it's a force all right. The weight you measure on a scales is only because it applies a force to your body. All aeronautics is based on using aerodynamics and fluid mechanics to oppose the force of gravity. We launch missiles by using rocket thrust against the force of gravity. A force does not care where it comes from, be it mechanical deflection (springs) or the effect of gravity. There is no dispute about this in my world of engineering. Einstein tried to explain the force of gravity by reference to distorted "spactime," but he did not ever deny it was a force in its effects. There is a force between charged bodies, too, due to the electrostatic field, yet we recognize it as a force.
There is a problem, however, with Einstein's line of development, as I mentioned. The Correspondence Principle (which Einstein claimed to identify accelerating frames of reference to gravity) can be falsified. Very elegant theories can be formulated, accepted, used, and turn out to be wrong (e.g., phlogiston). Very funny to me that, on this page, we can rail against the entrenched dogma of established science and uphold the mysterious claims of Nikola Tesla, yet we must bow down to Einstein (and Wikipedia) over a theory that is still under consideration.
I think this is the heart of our disagreement.
You also claim to be able to falsify Einsteins elevator thought experiment.
Here is the claim. Someone accelerating through space at 9.8 m/s^2 weighs the same (by stepping on a scale) as someone standing on the earth.
Einsteins claim is demonstrably and experimentally true. Do you really think you can falsify it? This I have to see.
The claim is that, by reference only to the INTERIOR of the elevator car, one can find no differences between gravity acceleration and inertial frame acceleration. By having accelerometers in all interior corners of the elevator car, it will be possible to detect acceleration vectors toward the center of the gravitational source (and thus its distance and location), and also the first-order (tidal) differences in acceleration magnitude. An accelerating reference frame will have neither of these detectable signatures.
Einstein's claim was never subjected to anything but cursory examination. If anything, it has been experimentally falsified by objects in orbit becoming "gravity gradient stabilized." (I have designed such satellites.) This would happen to them if they were hovering in the center of a compartment in supposedly zero-gravity (orbital) space.
Ergo, gravitational fields are not identical to frame acceleration fields. They have non-zero spatial derivatives.
No, the claim is for the entire elevator.
It would be exactly the same for the entire elevator being accelerated by a rocket. The accelerometer's vectors would point to the center of thrust.
Interestingly, an accelerometer (like a plumb bob) orbiting around the Sun in space (not near a planet) will point to the instantaneous center of the Sun 8 minutes ahead of its visual center if it is in an earth range orbital position.
That instantaneous positioning is why planets don't spiral into the Sun and objects are able to stay in orbit. If Gravity was a force there would always be a speed of light lag making orbitals impossible.