The Climate Data Changed My Mind
A 15-minute talk by Chris Martz, a young, 23-year old meteorologist.
He talks about growing up, arguing with his dad about climate change, discovering historical weather records that rarely make the news, and facing pressure from activists and even university administrators as his online audience grows.
How is this post Q-adjacent/Great Awakening adjacent?
One of the biggest revelations that Q brought to the masses is the concept of the psyop. Yet, in the midst of a full-blown 5G war being waged in all information spheres, many of us still get sidelined by this psyop or that psyop, and critical thinking is necessary more than ever to simply engage with the info war and keep a level head.
The Climate Change hoax is one of the greatest psyops perpetrated on the human population in the modern era. Entire populations, governments and institutions have been caught up in this operation.
But what should be clear to most of us now is how psyops work. Through a combination of emotional manipulation and information (or thought) injection, psyops can hijack a person's thinking and action and direct those towards the desired objective.
Think MKultra, ala Jason Bourne. The concept is to create extreme, emotionally traumatic experiences in order to fracture a person's psyche and then reprogram or craft a new personality that can be weaponized for [x] purpose.
The Role of Emotional Reality
Where does it start? On the emotional level. The emotions are always the gateway for the pysops.
This is why the global warming / climate disaster psyop has been so powerful. It targeted reactive and powerful emotions to bring people to a state where they would accept what they were being told without thinking about it as critically as they might otherwise. Emotions like outrage, righteous anger, pity, fear, and so forth.
One of the key objectives of the Q operation was, I believe, to help bring the masses out of the trance that decades of pysops have put them/us in, not by simply reacting, however, but by learning discernment, critical thinking, and questioning.
Why did Q mention scripture, the Bible, God, etc, so often? Because the best foundation for tackling any form of psyop is a well-grounded emotional stability, and the best emotional stability comes through a powerful, personal connection with the Creator, a relationship based in faith and love.
Not Just Data Alone
In this short talk, Chris Martz explains how, in his view, getting younger people to engage in breaking the climate psyop works best when there is an emotional element attached. Facts, data, just by themselves don't move most people, especially young people.
After an article in the NYP labeled Martz as the 'anti-Greta Thunberg', he adopted the moniker and embraced it. This is a young man who deserves support and attention, as he brings important balance to the whole situation. As the video proclaims, 'Climate Realism' is rising.
We should note here that emotions in and of themselves are neutral. They were designed by God for creative and useful purposes, but like all things, they can be used productively (by listening to them, recognizing them, learning what they teach us about ourselves and others), or they can be used manipulatively, for wrong and selfish purposes.
Any time someone is eliciting strong emotional reactions as a basis for presenting their arguments, we should be wary. On the other hand, based, grounded, non-reactive emotions are an important element of life. Things should be personal, and to convince anyone of our ideas, we should be able to engage with them emotionally at the start. Not in a manipulative way, but in an honest, open way.
(Think Charlie Kirk's style...)
In any case, emotional intelligence is one of the best defenses against mass-psyoppery and a powerful tool for liberating ourselves and others from a world of media deception.
I like the way you expressed that. One could certainly do a post or series of posts on fear and how it is used.
The reason I referenced the emotional factors in the way I did is because while fear is a super powerful mobilizer, I don't think its the primary or initial one.
I can still recall when I went to see 'An inconvenient truth', prompted by my brother. I don't think fear was really the primary or initial emotional trigger being used. Fear has certainly come down on the younger generation who were brought up with this stuff, but for the older generation, I believe it was other more subtle emotions, as I mentioned.
Fear is like a massive jet engine. But a lot of the psyops that are taking place everywhere all over today are not using fear, imo. Sure, the big ones, like Covid, even though a lot of the population weren't motivated by fear, but by other things: peer pressure, behaving 'righteously', guilt ("you're literally killing old people by not wearing a mask!", etc.
Another aspect I was thinking about when I wrote this post was the psyops that are (in my opinion) being targeted at the truth community, the 'awakened' people who have rejected the normie matrix. The way many inflooencers tease subtle emotions that some people aren't paying attention to: 'special knowledge', 'secret information' all have their emotional lure. Accusation ("-this person- is evil and despising them is good"), "this country is controlling us!!!", etc etc. Lots of psyops being waged today, particularly at our community, are using the subtle emotional leverages rather than the 'atom bombs' like fear.
In my view, of course.
I read a comment above, where someone wrote "My opinion of this otherwise good piece is the failure to bring forth the power of the main emotion being sought: FEAR", but for me, what this says is that this person is very heavily focused on specific certain psyops, and does not seem to be aware of all the others!
I might be wrong, but it seems to me that far too many people who escaped the zoo think that now they are outside it, they are completely free, looking back at the zoo wall and pointing to it, say, "look! See! I'm not in there!! I'm free!!" without realizing that at their back is another set of fencing, designed to keep them from going any further away.
Layers of fences, and by far one of the most powerful psyops has been convincing people to 'look here and not there'. So lots of people point at normies and say! "Look! see how controlled they are! How manipulated!" without ever thinking about "am I still being targeted? If so, how? What happened to all those evil controllers once I escaped the matrix? Did they just let me go? Or are they also targeting me on a new level now?"
Last I looked, Candace Owens had a following of millions <checks> 7M+!!!! Yet, to many of the people I respect for deep critical thinking, her manipulative methods are blatently obvious!
In fact, once you leave the normie matrix, things become far more complex, far more subtle, and the powers that be utilize far, far more subtle methods of psychological attack. Because anyone who wakes up is the bigger threat!!!!
Thanks for your comment!
End.
Here's the disinfo matrix graphic I mentioned: https://i.imgur.com/9DM3GlG.jpg
stored for further examination!
PS. I began looking at these processes early on in 2018 as I watched r/GreatAwakening posts throw up fake disinfo content, and observed how frens online reacted or responded to them.
No formal training in psyops or intel activity, but its probably my primary <defensive> focus re: the info war. Done a bunch of posts that look at some of these topics. Don't know if you've seen them, but they can generally be found by searching for 'clickbait' in the community search box.
kool graphic, by the way...
Yeah, I enjoy most of your posts. Thoughtful. Apparently like you, I was way behind on the "info battlefield" training and the lingo when I started back in 2020. I was downright scandalized by the content on 4chan, voat and poal until I figured out why it was necessary. We've come a long way, and GAW has been a big part of my learning curve.
As for the graphic, I got it from this blog post, which is all about comms related to disinfo. I don't agree with everything in the post, and the author often rambles, but it's loaded with good info. https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2023/07/26/disinfo-deconstruction/
Not sure if its the same one, but it reminds me of a 'decoding symbols' substack very occasionally linked to on the board.
Didn't agree with a good deal of that substack - its hardcore symbol stuff, which I think sometimes misses the point.
Will investigate further.
That's an interesting way to think about it.
I think most of the psyop techniques are fear-based, in that persuasion techniques like "wear your mask to save Grandma" are using the fear of isolating the target (i.e., the non-masker is not afraid of killing Grandma because he doesn't think he is, but he is supposed to be afraid of being blackballed from society), and that most of that phenomenon is built largely on fear as it's primary foundation. But sussing out the myriad emotions quickly gets nuanced and subjective, and therefore less useful as a discussion framework, so not worth going into. Especially because there are some that are not based on fear at all, as you've pointed out
I also think, that as you're creating a framework for discussion, there are different phenomena that are useful to separate out. For example, the 'layers of fences' isn't something that I'd call a psyop, but rather an architectural feature of the matrix. I had a good graphic on it at one point; I'll see if I can find it. And yes, it's amazing to see how many people fall for a similar trap after escaping from the first one. I definitely have done that a few times even after thinking myself awake; at this point I believe it's a necessary evolutionary step for nearly every anon.
I really like the response. Thoughtful and articulate.
In reflection, I wonder if perhaps I'm thinking of fear only in a limited, specific context - 'the atom bombs' ala worldwide COVID disaster and Great's How Dare You meltdown - but I think you're right that it also works on more subtle levels, like a quiet fear of being blackballed, or even thought ill of. There's room for expanded thinking, for sure.
As for evolution, actually, I had never heard of the expression 'limited hangout' until a very few years back. Gradual discovery of certain concepts helps to develop one's framework for engagement, even if those ideas are present in some form, definition brings.... definition.
Re: layers of fences, yes, I think the concept of 'an architectural feature of the matrix' works on various levels. What I would say is, that psyops are part of the instrument palette that is used to create and reinforce that architecture.