He's in at least 12 Q drops. Why does checking out a source / news story with the fbi in 2017 make him a bad guy? Comey was the head at that time. Maybe it was a sting or was part of incriminating guilty parties in the fbi and cleaning out the fbi. We don't know yet.
Why on QAnon's message board (4 chan/8chan) in 2017, that Solomon had a encounter, late at night by two men from a intelligence (Q?) community, that told him he was at the "tip of a very large iceberg" involving FISA and the Russiagate investigation, and to "drill down" into the story?
Yeah, it could be he was used as a plant that Page, Kortan, and Strzok were stupid enough to not see through in order to get them to dig a deeper hole for themselves re: “controlling the narrative.”
It’s also possible he also possesses a lukewarm IQ and was trying to help the FBI paint the picture they wanted. Kortan goes back to Page and Strzok in the full files I linked to ask if Solomon’s final draft was okay for publishing.
Solomon being a useful plant would be the only reason I’d consider him providing Circa’s story to the RussiaRussiaRussia squad for a “context check” would be acceptable.
Also, for anyone interested, there’s files in here related to Hillary’s emails. I’m not entirely sure why, other than Strzok and Page were asked by Michael Zapotosky if a grand jury was empaneled over her emails (because that was the reason given for the redactions, and the jury convening had not been made public at the time)
Never trusted Solomon. My radar was up on him years ago when a lot of the stuff he broke turned out to be a big nothing burger. All rabbit trails and disinformation. If this is true, it all now makes sense. Controlled opposition. Be careful who you follow.
I don't necessarily trust people simply because they are mentioned in some Q posts. I need more to go on than that. This doc does not have enough info to really make a determination about him one way or the other. Personally, I don't listen to him because I have simply not found the news he reports as being completely credible. As I already stated, it ends up being nothing to get excited about. Something is always ready to drop and then it doesn't.
There’s always the option that he was being used to tease things to get people to make incriminating mistakes “before the story dropped.” There’s also always the option he was feeding people stories before publishing to make sure they fit the narrative. The fact Kortan was passing this draft on to Page and Strzok to make sure it read like they were ~just doing due diligence~ really grinds my gears.
Whenever someone tells me they’re a journalist I now say, “Oh, you like telling stories. Unlike a reporter, who just provides the facts.” They usually get offended, but I am tired of dealing with talking heads.
I totally agree. What passes for news anymore is nothing but speculation and opinion. Most of the time there are no facts actually presented to back up their claims. It's always, trust me bro, I have it on good "insider" authority. WTF? That's the problem with Solomon. No facts, just trust me, it should drop next week. Well, we're still waiting.
Also, given how corrupt the FBI and the DOJ had been in DC during that time, any correspondence with them is sus. The media is full of psyops, misdirection, and outright lies and fabrications. I don't trust any of them - even those claiming to be on the right. Sadly, most will not do their own due diligence before running with their own narratives. Some of the crap circulating out there is off the hook. The propaganda is crazy and people continue to take it in - right and left.
I thought he was a good guy.
He's in at least 12 Q drops. Why does checking out a source / news story with the fbi in 2017 make him a bad guy? Comey was the head at that time. Maybe it was a sting or was part of incriminating guilty parties in the fbi and cleaning out the fbi. We don't know yet.
Why on QAnon's message board (4 chan/8chan) in 2017, that Solomon had a encounter, late at night by two men from a intelligence (Q?) community, that told him he was at the "tip of a very large iceberg" involving FISA and the Russiagate investigation, and to "drill down" into the story?
Who is QAnon? There is Q and anons.
I never heard that but I wouldn't be surprised. It does seem over the years that he has had good tips/information on corruption stories.
Yeah, it could be he was used as a plant that Page, Kortan, and Strzok were stupid enough to not see through in order to get them to dig a deeper hole for themselves re: “controlling the narrative.”
It’s also possible he also possesses a lukewarm IQ and was trying to help the FBI paint the picture they wanted. Kortan goes back to Page and Strzok in the full files I linked to ask if Solomon’s final draft was okay for publishing.
Solomon being a useful plant would be the only reason I’d consider him providing Circa’s story to the RussiaRussiaRussia squad for a “context check” would be acceptable.
Not enough info to be sure, but my spidey senses say his is a white hat.
Same. Now that I know better, I have removed him and just the news from my feeds.
He mainly posted teasers (probably to farm engagement or whatever) with most of them turning out to be nothing-burgers... so no great loss.
Agree
Then Operation Trust 2.0 did it's job!
I didn’t really have opinions about him, but perhaps this shows no one should trust someone who previously worked for WaPo…
Link to PDF on FBI Vault
Also, for anyone interested, there’s files in here related to Hillary’s emails. I’m not entirely sure why, other than Strzok and Page were asked by Michael Zapotosky if a grand jury was empaneled over her emails (because that was the reason given for the redactions, and the jury convening had not been made public at the time)
Remember... "if that f*ing bastard wins, we're all going to hang from nooses!" Hillary Clinton
lol.
Still waiting for that to happen. Not holding my breath at this point.
Never trusted Solomon. My radar was up on him years ago when a lot of the stuff he broke turned out to be a big nothing burger. All rabbit trails and disinformation. If this is true, it all now makes sense. Controlled opposition. Be careful who you follow.
I don't necessarily trust people simply because they are mentioned in some Q posts. I need more to go on than that. This doc does not have enough info to really make a determination about him one way or the other. Personally, I don't listen to him because I have simply not found the news he reports as being completely credible. As I already stated, it ends up being nothing to get excited about. Something is always ready to drop and then it doesn't.
I’ve never really followed him.
There’s always the option that he was being used to tease things to get people to make incriminating mistakes “before the story dropped.” There’s also always the option he was feeding people stories before publishing to make sure they fit the narrative. The fact Kortan was passing this draft on to Page and Strzok to make sure it read like they were ~just doing due diligence~ really grinds my gears.
Whenever someone tells me they’re a journalist I now say, “Oh, you like telling stories. Unlike a reporter, who just provides the facts.” They usually get offended, but I am tired of dealing with talking heads.
I totally agree. What passes for news anymore is nothing but speculation and opinion. Most of the time there are no facts actually presented to back up their claims. It's always, trust me bro, I have it on good "insider" authority. WTF? That's the problem with Solomon. No facts, just trust me, it should drop next week. Well, we're still waiting.
Also, given how corrupt the FBI and the DOJ had been in DC during that time, any correspondence with them is sus. The media is full of psyops, misdirection, and outright lies and fabrications. I don't trust any of them - even those claiming to be on the right. Sadly, most will not do their own due diligence before running with their own narratives. Some of the crap circulating out there is off the hook. The propaganda is crazy and people continue to take it in - right and left.