Most of this is easily verifiable, especially about the other countries that prohibit fluoridation of drinking water. The Nazi research might take some digging. Would appreciate a link from anyone who already has the sauce on the original (or even better, translated to English) research.
We can expect this to change whenever the new country is born (this Independence Day? 🤞!). But here's the brief summary of the fiendish fluoridation op that anyone without their own water well has been subjected to, designed to drive people to media-managed conformity.
https://sunnysjournal.com/2026/06/03/fluoride-isnt-for-teeth-its-for-your-obedience-mrkidpool17/
That's a bullshit claim.
Which part: the purpose of fluoride, i.e. pineal gland calcification, or the Nazi origin? Or the whole thing?
I'm confident I don't need fluoride, and that the practice of fluoridating water is not performed in many other countries, so that part of the info is directly observable. But the rest of the post depends on either trust or research that I haven't personally done.
I agree we don't need fluoride.
Fluoride is an industrial waste product. Added to water, toothpaste, etc. on false pretenses to make money.
You and I will probably agree on that.
But the idea that the Germans were using it pacify the jews in the camps is a made-up bullshit story.
Most of the narrative from that era is made-up nonsense.
Even "Shindler's List," which is what a lot of people think is a documentary and they think it documents things that actually happened, is just fiction.
The book was originally titled "Shindler's Ark," and won the "Best Book of Fiction" by the LA Times -- before Spielberg made it into a movie.
The inside book cover even says that all events are a figment of the author's imagination.
Likewise, somebody just made up the story about the flouride in the German camps.
No evidence to support it.
Just like the ridiculous claims of the "rollercoaster of death" and the "Holocaust" itself.
All entirely fiction.
Fluoride to prisoners in concentration camps doesn't make sense even according to the author's premise: there is no need for psychological manipulation when the people you deal with are prisoners under direct physical control. Helpless prisoners under armed guard don't require pacification.
Reading the post quickly, I overlooked the camps and assumed the intent was to augment propaganda used on the German people, which would jive with the purported psychological manipulation angle.
I've never heard of the rollercoaster of death, and I'm glad I didn't: I might laugh at the wrong time. I'm okay being considered crazy, but try to be strategic about it.
I still don't like fluoridation, but I'll pull back on using this piece as an argument. Thanks.
The Germans were not Nazi's. The Edomite Jews are the Nazi's. They're the ones who killed 60 million Christians in 1917 Russia.
"Nazi" is a pejorative term that the jews came up with to attack the Germans. It means "idiot."
I agree that the jews are the Edomites and I agree they systematically murdered 60 million Whites in Russia and Ukraine.
THAT IS WHY Hitler was fighting them.
Jews created communism, used it to attack the Russian people, overthrow their government, murder millions, and they were coming for the Germans next (and then all of Europe, and then the world).
But I would never call the jews "Nazis," since I don't think that is accurate. It isn't accurate about the Germans, either. It's just an attack word, like the stupid "anti-semite" term they throw around to get sympathy.
I meant the Judean Edomites own that word. They even tried to pin that word on President Trump. Hitler hated that word. When Hitlers speeches and words are translated to English, he is quite remarkable. But in German he sounds evil.
Plenty of German Nazis. All according to selection criteria. Jews not accepted.
What on Earth are you talking about with 60 million Russian casualties in 1917? The estimated casualties from World War I (1914-1917) were 15-22 million (troops + civilians) and the estimated casualties from the Russian Civil War (1917-1922) were 7-12 million (troops + civilians).
Not specifically 1917. That's just when it started.
The Holodomor (a subject usually not mentioned in school text books) extended into the 1930's.
Estimated 60 million murdered, including Russians and many Ukrainians starved to death.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/S7vM7bW6nGn1/
The moment Hitler came to power in 1933, the jews declared war on Germany by all jews, worldwide, boycotting German products.
This was at a time when Germany was already in a severe depression.
https://imgs.search.brave.com/zlMeADARjla3Cgc7xSt_2hb8yFyyvfzkE0vibEFgJao/rs:fit:500:0:1:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi5t/ZXRhcGVkaWEub3Jn/L20vaW1hZ2VzLzEv/MTMvSnVkZWEtZGVj/bGFyZXMtd2FyLW9u/LWdlcm1hbnktMTkz/My5qcGc
The Germans knew what the jews had been doing in Russia and Ukraine for the past 15 years or so, and they knew Germany was next.
The Bolsheviks in Poland were systematically torturing, raping, and murdering the Germans living in Poland (remember: the post-WW1 borders changed, so that Germans who had been "living in Germany" were now suddenly "living in Poland" -- their land was the same, but the borders were changed due to the post-WW1 treaty agreement).
Hitler sent his army into Poland to stop the atrocities, which gave England and France an excuse to start WW2 by declaring war on Germany.
Here is a speech by Hitler explaning his reasons, along with some graphic images of what was going on there.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GvJVRJdPi9K8
The Germans had no choice but prepare to fight.
Holodomor (1932-1933) was decreed by Stalin (not a Jew), 3.5-10 million killed.
I don't engage in post-facto fantasy. Or Nazi propaganda.
Its Hydrofluorosilicic Acid.
https://alliancechemical.com/pages/chemicals-hydrofluorosilicic-acidhttps://alliancechemical.com/pages/chemicals-hydrofluorosilicic-acid