FISA 702 is the essential "lockbox/key" to unlock the entire NSA database for election data review: This is overstated. Section 702 is one authority among many for collection (others include traditional FISA Title I with warrants, EO 12333, etc.). It is targeted (not bulk vacuuming of all data), focused on foreign targets, and subject to minimization rules, certifications, and FISC (FISA Court) oversight. Collection happens via targeting procedures; 702 isn't the sole "baseline" or prerequisite for all metadata/activity flow capture. Without renewal, other tools and existing certifications would still operate for a time.
The database contains "all" electronic data surrounding U.S. elections that could granularly prove manipulation: No public evidence supports this as a comprehensive "digital record of elections." Election infrastructure (voting machines, tabulation, voter rolls) is primarily state/local and not routinely funneled into NSA's foreign intel databases. Foreign interference (e.g., disinformation, hacking attempts) is tracked, but domestic election administration data isn't a core NSA mission. Claims of broad "manipulation" evidence sitting there ready to be unlocked echo unproven 2020 election theories and lack declassified confirmation. Snowden/Clapper discussions highlighted over-collection broadly, not election specifics.
Okay, go ahead and ask GROK if Ivermectin is effective against Covid and see what answer you get, then tell me that GROK know the truth from a lie.
I believe in this case Sundance over Grok. Sundance knows how to thread all the pieces together and Grok only has a boilerplate understanding of 702 matters.
So much come together when you understand this!!
u/#q2694
Thanks Mods
From Grok:
Overstated or Speculative Claims
FISA 702 is the essential "lockbox/key" to unlock the entire NSA database for election data review: This is overstated. Section 702 is one authority among many for collection (others include traditional FISA Title I with warrants, EO 12333, etc.). It is targeted (not bulk vacuuming of all data), focused on foreign targets, and subject to minimization rules, certifications, and FISC (FISA Court) oversight. Collection happens via targeting procedures; 702 isn't the sole "baseline" or prerequisite for all metadata/activity flow capture. Without renewal, other tools and existing certifications would still operate for a time.
The database contains "all" electronic data surrounding U.S. elections that could granularly prove manipulation: No public evidence supports this as a comprehensive "digital record of elections." Election infrastructure (voting machines, tabulation, voter rolls) is primarily state/local and not routinely funneled into NSA's foreign intel databases. Foreign interference (e.g., disinformation, hacking attempts) is tracked, but domestic election administration data isn't a core NSA mission. Claims of broad "manipulation" evidence sitting there ready to be unlocked echo unproven 2020 election theories and lack declassified confirmation. Snowden/Clapper discussions highlighted over-collection broadly, not election specifics.
Okay, go ahead and ask GROK if Ivermectin is effective against Covid and see what answer you get, then tell me that GROK know the truth from a lie.
I believe in this case Sundance over Grok. Sundance knows how to thread all the pieces together and Grok only has a boilerplate understanding of 702 matters.