No. I'm saying that accusations require evidence, not team jerseys.
If the GovGreed logic is valid, it should apply consistently.
What I find interesting is that nobody is asking the OP for evidence that all of those congressional trades were actually insider trading. The AI report itself is being accepted at face value.
But the moment Trump gets mentioned, sauce is needed.
Either we should be asking for evidence in both cases, or neither. Applying different standards depending on whose name is involved is exactly the inconsistency I'm pointing out.
Do you really not understand the concept of one standard for everyone? I can't tell if you're being deliberetly obtuse or if it's such a bizarre cocept that you've never encountered before and are having problems understanding how it works....
You seem to be claiming Trump is insider trading, no?
We expect sauce around here. Make it spicy.
u/#spicy
No. I'm saying that accusations require evidence, not team jerseys.
If the GovGreed logic is valid, it should apply consistently.
What I find interesting is that nobody is asking the OP for evidence that all of those congressional trades were actually insider trading. The AI report itself is being accepted at face value.
But the moment Trump gets mentioned, sauce is needed.
Either we should be asking for evidence in both cases, or neither. Applying different standards depending on whose name is involved is exactly the inconsistency I'm pointing out.
Do you really not understand the concept of one standard for everyone? I can't tell if you're being deliberetly obtuse or if it's such a bizarre cocept that you've never encountered before and are having problems understanding how it works....
u/#ummwhat
Uh huh