Most of the perpetrators here were legal. Does that make their rape gangs OK?
The sheer number of perpetrators means either the whole community was involved, or knew about it and said nothing. Doesn't that mean it was all of them?
YES, I mean all immigrants, regardless of legality, regardless of background, regardless of where they were born, and regardless of citizenship
Involved, complicit, suspect, or not with the risk. No exceptions. Like it or not, that is what everyone thinks.
Now ban me if you're going to, but before you do, you'd better get ready to realise that everyone's going to see you're censoring the obvious truth about them.
Can you think of any exceptions?
The thing is, in the truth movement you have to say things that are true and that you can back up or you are damaging our cause.
You are generalising to all immigrants, no matter their background or legality.
Most of the perpetrators here were legal. Does that make their rape gangs OK?
The sheer number of perpetrators means either the whole community was involved, or knew about it and said nothing. Doesn't that mean it was all of them?
YES, I mean all immigrants, regardless of legality, regardless of background, regardless of where they were born, and regardless of citizenship
Involved, complicit, suspect, or not with the risk. No exceptions. Like it or not, that is what everyone thinks.
Now ban me if you're going to, but before you do, you'd better get ready to realise that everyone's going to see you're censoring the obvious truth about them.
OK, I get that you don't want immigration from low-trust, high-crime communities into our high-trust, low-crime countries.
That is reasonable and it would seriously reduce the crime load if it were stopped.
This is what I think too.
I just want us to say accurate statements here on GAW and it's my job to be a stickler for it.
Alright then, sorry, sounds like I got you wrong. Hope you can understand that there is censorship everywhere