The colonists arrived in America on the Mayflower in 1620. The Dutch (now Afrikaners) arrived in South Africa (then unsettled) at the Cape of Good Hope in 1652. Do they not have as much right to be called "Africans" as we have to be called "Americans"? Or do we both have to be called "Europeans"?
The Picts were part of the British racial heritage. Look up pictures of how they dressed and lived and compare to tribal Africa. https://allthatsinteresting.com/picts Not much different (maybe more ornate). When you look down your nose at someone, beware that you are not simply cricking your neck backward.
not a real african where's his lip plate, spear, and loin cloth? He does have a million kids though by a bunch of baby mammas so maybe he really is
The colonists arrived in America on the Mayflower in 1620. The Dutch (now Afrikaners) arrived in South Africa (then unsettled) at the Cape of Good Hope in 1652. Do they not have as much right to be called "Africans" as we have to be called "Americans"? Or do we both have to be called "Europeans"?
You obviously are leaving out the Nubians and the Kingdom of Kush, who were parallel to the Egyptians in culture and civilization. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubians#/media/File:Epoca_tolemaica,_stata_d'uomo_con_fascetta_e_capelli_ricci,_120-100_ac_ca..JPG (Not to mention leaving out the Egyptians.) This is a bit like saying the Italians couldn't have produced a Leonardo or a Michaelangelo, by pointing at Sicily.
The Picts were part of the British racial heritage. Look up pictures of how they dressed and lived and compare to tribal Africa. https://allthatsinteresting.com/picts Not much different (maybe more ornate). When you look down your nose at someone, beware that you are not simply cricking your neck backward.