What about it? Different story. I can say that one analysis pointed to the weakening effect of a long-duration fire in the core of the building that caused the floor beams to expand from the heat and dislodge themselves from their mounting brackets on structural columns. It got to a point where they disconnected and it was an avalanche all the way down. Not my analysis, but prove it wrong.
Airplanes crash far too often, but fires are common. There are such things as jet engines whose combustors are hot, broken open by the crash, or still running and producing flame. What started the fire is not a question for airplane crashes.
What about #7?
What about it? Different story. I can say that one analysis pointed to the weakening effect of a long-duration fire in the core of the building that caused the floor beams to expand from the heat and dislodge themselves from their mounting brackets on structural columns. It got to a point where they disconnected and it was an avalanche all the way down. Not my analysis, but prove it wrong.
What started the fire?
Airplanes crash far too often, but fires are common. There are such things as jet engines whose combustors are hot, broken open by the crash, or still running and producing flame. What started the fire is not a question for airplane crashes.
Dr. Halsey of the university of Alaska Anchorage did an in depth study on building 7. He's an engineer. Check it out. Very interesting
I did manage to find an in-depth report and read it. I don't know if it was his, offhand.