The problem is, however, that the States have jurisdiction over the federal elections in their state. How do you secure federal elections held in the states without expanding federalism and the reach of the federal govt into state jurisdictions?
This gets dicey when we start arguing AGAINST states' rights when we argue in favor of them so much when it comes to things like education policy, local law enforcement and criminal justice, land use, zoning, healthcare delivery and state level reforms, gun control and permitting, abortion regulation, homeschooling and parental rights in schooling and religious liberty exemptions from state mandates.
It's hard to argue in favor of states' rights out of one side of the mouth and then argue against it out of the other side.
THEY ARE THE RADICAL LEFT !
just reinforces that American elections remain "for sale"
Things seem to be coming to a head
Watch: now Thune and the dumbass Republicans (who never fail to give away their victories) will have political cover to get it done now.
Ficking losers with no backbone. I hate them.
The problem is, however, that the States have jurisdiction over the federal elections in their state. How do you secure federal elections held in the states without expanding federalism and the reach of the federal govt into state jurisdictions?
This gets dicey when we start arguing AGAINST states' rights when we argue in favor of them so much when it comes to things like education policy, local law enforcement and criminal justice, land use, zoning, healthcare delivery and state level reforms, gun control and permitting, abortion regulation, homeschooling and parental rights in schooling and religious liberty exemptions from state mandates.
It's hard to argue in favor of states' rights out of one side of the mouth and then argue against it out of the other side.
The Fed has a right to intercede when a state fails to uphold the law of the land.