I'm no legal scholar, but it seems like his wording could open the door to grouping sexual orientation together with gender dysphoria as a mutable mental state as well. Who knows?
Good clarification. Thanks. I'm baffled at the fact that we even need to define, clarify or explain this in any way. It's like saying "this is a blue crayon. It writes blue. This is a red crayon. It writes red."
I like that man
in other words... Mental Illness
Amen to that.
I'm no legal scholar, but it seems like his wording could open the door to grouping sexual orientation together with gender dysphoria as a mutable mental state as well. Who knows?
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2071973598521090058?s=20
He's speaking in a purely legal sense about physical sex in regards to judicial scrutiny.
Not in a let's round up 1 percent of the population and remove their personal liberties because we disagree with them.
But in a how should the judicial branch legislate regarding gender dysphoria.
This wasn't really meant to be the shocker some social media heads think it is
Good clarification. Thanks. I'm baffled at the fact that we even need to define, clarify or explain this in any way. It's like saying "this is a blue crayon. It writes blue. This is a red crayon. It writes red."
Can we clone him?