A coded message?
(www.thejournal.ie)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
There is no code here if you listen to the whole sentence in context:
The prior AF1s were 'bugged' to their tail fins during production.
Why would we think this one wasn't bugged by Qatar?
There is technology that can easily discover bugs.
...when you trust Qatar more than the people in your own country.
Good question. I also ask the same.
Not sure about modification standards on U.S. built planes, but I do know that as for the former royal Qatari plane, which is only a stand-in.
Defense contractor L3Harris performed an intensive, classified 10-month refit in Texas to install critical, secure presidential communications and defensive countermeasures.
I watched a tv show last night showing the work involved to convert the plane for use as AF-1. Very involved, highly classified stuff. They tore that plane apart and rebuilt it, everything in the cock pit, special classified protective safety additions and the engines were even rebuilt to higher specs, and modifications to make them more powerful as well as quieter. Showed several of the completed rooms, ie presidential bedroom, office, kitchen, restroom, many parts not shown due to being classified. Interesting show, don't remember what channel it was. Possible history channel, just don't recall. I have Direct tv.
http://tbbaviation.com/air-force-one-replacement-delayed-amid-boeing-trouble/
This is what he's referencing. Boeing is too DEI'd up at this point to get the job done
Yeah, to be fair, perhaps the only way in which Qatar is better is the complete lack of diversity. It is one of the most ethnically homogenous societies on earth. It's not as if they'd be dumb enough to let a woman build a plane
Honestly, I just think this is part of a sentence taken out of context by a leftist rag like the journal.ie.
Just read the comments under the article to get an idea of the type of leftist scum that “read” this “article”. Just look at the vile childish comments defaming President Trump.
They don’t even attribute it to a “journalist”, just AFP;
So just a hit piece all the faggot leftist rags can cut and paste.
Ah, you're right, I've been fooled by the shitlibs.
I hope the editor is hanged
In time, possibly.
“The USA couldn’t build a plane like this” in circumstances where a) it did and b) American is obviously better seems like unambiguous comms to me. Anyone been able to interpret?
He meant a plane that was not filled with spy devices. America couldnt build that.
Was it but before Boeing acquired mcdonald douglas or before MD transformed the company?
Good questions
You heritage too?