Why should we? The entitlement to think we shohld have free energy is a liberal one.
Energy is a finite resource. There's no magical free energy producer out there. Even if it was, (it's not), it would still have to have people running it, getting it to you, maintaining the system, etc. They wouldn't work for free.
So why would you expect to get it for "free"? Who do you think would cover those bills? The government? Which is why I call it a liberal mindset.
You are thinking of centralised energy production, and its not finite at all. Energy can't be destroyed, it can only be changed into another form of energy. As in electricity heating our home using infra red radiation.
But if we can stop this process and make energy into a closed loop we can harvest this energy forever. It's a scientific mindset which has nothing to do with divisive politics.
Search for Victor Schauberger, and also look at this.
Energy can't be created or destroyed, that's true. But every time you convert it (like electricity to heat), you lose some as unusable waste heat.
That's basic physics (Second Law of Thermodynamics). You can't make a perfect "closed loop" that runs forever without adding new energy.
Schauberger had cool ideas about water and vortices, but none of them created free energy that beats physics. Real progress comes from better batteries, solar, nuclear, etc, not magic loops.
If someone actually builds a working one, it'll change everything. Until then, it's just a fun idea that doesn't work in practice.
And even if they DID actually build one, it would still cost money to produce and transport it. So again, why would you expect to get it for free?
(And sorry, I'm not downloading anything from random, sketchy sites.)
Energy being finite is an artificial construct, created by the elite cabal to control us. They create scarcity, and then ration it out for enormous profits. They have so thoroughly taken over our institutions that anyone bringing up free energy is immediately dismissed and ostracised. Isn't science suppose to be about asking questions and exploring? But for some reason they won't even tolerate dicussion on this topic.
The elites control our instutions and sources of information. There isn't "credible evidence" because they have decided there shouldn't be any. We often see individuals come out with free energy ideas, only for them to quickly be silenced. They're often portrayed as shills for trying to sell their ideas, as if that isn't the basis capitalism. Its rediculous that people think these inventions should be given away for free when they wouldn't expect that anyone else. If you invent a free energy device, why shouldn't you also be able to feed your family?
Asking for evidence is playing the game by the rules of the elite. I and many others like me are taking the bold step to refuse to play by their rules. When we are attuned to truth, our gut instinct is almost always correct. This is like how we know the 2020 election was stolen. I can't prove it, there is no evidence for it, but we know it is true.
Why should we? The entitlement to think we shohld have free energy is a liberal one.
Energy is a finite resource. There's no magical free energy producer out there. Even if it was, (it's not), it would still have to have people running it, getting it to you, maintaining the system, etc. They wouldn't work for free.
So why would you expect to get it for "free"? Who do you think would cover those bills? The government? Which is why I call it a liberal mindset.
You are thinking of centralised energy production, and its not finite at all. Energy can't be destroyed, it can only be changed into another form of energy. As in electricity heating our home using infra red radiation.
But if we can stop this process and make energy into a closed loop we can harvest this energy forever. It's a scientific mindset which has nothing to do with divisive politics.
Search for Victor Schauberger, and also look at this.
https://upload.disroot.org/r/P0kt03TR#shkAps8shkhLCR0I5HrgAEqlXeYwTzdcnxvnp6jP2EU=
Energy can't be created or destroyed, that's true. But every time you convert it (like electricity to heat), you lose some as unusable waste heat.
That's basic physics (Second Law of Thermodynamics). You can't make a perfect "closed loop" that runs forever without adding new energy.
Schauberger had cool ideas about water and vortices, but none of them created free energy that beats physics. Real progress comes from better batteries, solar, nuclear, etc, not magic loops.
If someone actually builds a working one, it'll change everything. Until then, it's just a fun idea that doesn't work in practice.
And even if they DID actually build one, it would still cost money to produce and transport it. So again, why would you expect to get it for free?
(And sorry, I'm not downloading anything from random, sketchy sites.)
"Energy can't be created or destroyed, that's true."
It's Mass/energy since mass and energy are interchangeable per Einstein's immortal e=mc^2 equation
This presumes that the universe is a closed system.
The MEG.
Laws can be changed, though we need to move quickely while we still have a majority in the house and senate.
No, the Second Law of Thermodynamics can't be changed. It's pretty much a reality of our existance.
It's not something that can be changed by a vote in Congress.
The liberal/leftist view is that it should be subsidized by the government.
The view of right/progress is that it can be harnessed so cheaply (from sun/ether) as to essentially become free.
Does that help?
Energy being finite is an artificial construct, created by the elite cabal to control us. They create scarcity, and then ration it out for enormous profits. They have so thoroughly taken over our institutions that anyone bringing up free energy is immediately dismissed and ostracised. Isn't science suppose to be about asking questions and exploring? But for some reason they won't even tolerate dicussion on this topic.
Best credible evidence to support this?
The elites control our instutions and sources of information. There isn't "credible evidence" because they have decided there shouldn't be any. We often see individuals come out with free energy ideas, only for them to quickly be silenced. They're often portrayed as shills for trying to sell their ideas, as if that isn't the basis capitalism. Its rediculous that people think these inventions should be given away for free when they wouldn't expect that anyone else. If you invent a free energy device, why shouldn't you also be able to feed your family?
Asking for evidence is playing the game by the rules of the elite. I and many others like me are taking the bold step to refuse to play by their rules. When we are attuned to truth, our gut instinct is almost always correct. This is like how we know the 2020 election was stolen. I can't prove it, there is no evidence for it, but we know it is true.
Why do you believe so solidly if you acknowlege no credible evidence exists to support it?