That is the exact opposite of the truth. I told you exactly and precisely my position. You demanded a different interpretation of my position. Maybe because it had too many lines of text? Maybe because you were fishing for a dumbed down position so it could fit your agenda? In any case, the information ("answer") was there, twice, explicitly (and more implicitly), without ambiguity.
You are literally making shit up. You are clearly trying to gaslight. I just can't figure out why.
Regardless, I then explicitly stated that dumbing it down even further than I had already twicewould diminish my position. I had reasons for not AGAIN restating what I had already said.
That is not "refusing to answer." it's the opposite. And you still haven't bother to answer my question:
What is your real purpose here?
It's clearly not trying to understand my position, since I have done so in multiple ways. Instead you keep claiming the opposite with also clearly not actually attempting to hear what I've said. That is straight out of the definition of gaslighting. So what is your purpose?
My real purpose is to understand your position so I can have a debate. I honestly dont think you understand what "a position in a debate" means.
Its very easy. I will show you how to state your position. Here is my position:
Datacenters are essential for computational power, which is the currency in the next technological progress - autonomous agents. Autonomous agents (both digital and physical) will become as ubiquitious as cars or phones, and will require this immense computational power to reach this goal. This technological progress is what gives US freedom from the Banksters.
Now anyone can debate with me by trying to pick apart each part of it and we will have a lively discussion.
That is the exact opposite of the truth. I told you exactly and precisely my position. You demanded a different interpretation of my position. Maybe because it had too many lines of text? Maybe because you were fishing for a dumbed down position so it could fit your agenda? In any case, the information ("answer") was there, twice, explicitly (and more implicitly), without ambiguity.
You are literally making shit up. You are clearly trying to gaslight. I just can't figure out why.
Regardless, I then explicitly stated that dumbing it down even further than I had already twice would diminish my position. I had reasons for not AGAIN restating what I had already said.
That is not "refusing to answer." it's the opposite. And you still haven't bother to answer my question:
What is your real purpose here?
It's clearly not trying to understand my position, since I have done so in multiple ways. Instead you keep claiming the opposite with also clearly not actually attempting to hear what I've said. That is straight out of the definition of gaslighting. So what is your purpose?
My real purpose is to understand your position so I can have a debate. I honestly dont think you understand what "a position in a debate" means.
Its very easy. I will show you how to state your position. Here is my position:
Datacenters are essential for computational power, which is the currency in the next technological progress - autonomous agents. Autonomous agents (both digital and physical) will become as ubiquitious as cars or phones, and will require this immense computational power to reach this goal. This technological progress is what gives US freedom from the Banksters.
Now anyone can debate with me by trying to pick apart each part of it and we will have a lively discussion.
Give it a try.