What an odd thing to say.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
...honesty is shocking when heard in the context of today's reality...
Shows how little they worry about actual accountability. Just coming out and being proud of the fact they've compromised the election system and even RINOs are on their side (because they need to cheat as well to keep MAGA out of the party)
Democrats have always been against voter ID. It’s not odd to say at all.
Their excuse is that their disenfranchised minority voters are incapable of getting a valid ID.
We know the truth is because there is rampant voter fraud, but the left will always deny it.
Smugly insistent their voters are the most educated and simultaneously too stupid to acquire ID.
Although from Minsk this Ukranian Polish Sausage wouldn't know the truth if she were choking on it like a Ball Park Frank (Not a Anne Frank).
It's a Supremacist Victim flaw.
'Democrats' will Never win elections without committing treason by fixing elections Because, Most working Democrats are now (after obama) MAGA and have elected Trump three times.
This is the first thing that I have ever agreed with her about. 😆
The truth is that Democrats can honestly win elections. All they have to do is provide a winning platform. Right now their platform is "Get Trump," and give undocumented people everything they want. Bill Clinton won in the 1990s because he governed like a Republican.
No, Bill Clinton won in 92 because his platform was moderately to the right. He would have been a great president if he kept any of his campaign promises. He also won because the DNC got Ross Perot to run as a third party candidate who could siphon votes from the center-right after the GHWB tax hike.
True, he didn't keep many of his campaign promises, But the truth is that Bill Clinton governed to the right which is what his platform was. He basically followed the KISS saying which is "Keep It Simple Stupid." Yes they did have a "tax increase." And Bill did let Hillary introduce her healthcare system, to the point that the press dubbed her "co-President," but Congress put Hillary in her place.as she is the First Lady, not the President. Bill Clinton pretty much did for Ronald Reagan what President Trump wanted Joe Biden to do and that is be a caretaker for the country.
As for the 1992 election, Bush 41 was in deep trouble that year as he got the country into a recession, did not finish the job in Iraq, and broke one of his main campaign promises which was "Read my Lips, NO NEW TAXES." I think the 1992 GOP would have been better served by forcing Bush 41 to not go for that 2nd term and have Pat Buchanan be the standard for the party. Translation, Americans wanted an outsider and both Ross Perot and Bill Clinton offered that option.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=left+wing+policies+implemented+during+bill+clinton%27s+terms&form=APIPA1&PC=APPD
That is true, but voters are affected by the economy which was in recession at the end of Bush 41's term but rebounded under Clinton. The economy is pretty much what the sheep remember at the polls.
Cheating bitch. She should be behind bars
Eventually.
That's ok.
Just pass it and fix it when you get power again!