The post came across as some kind of news must have come out that Trump is not sending / stopping Vance, so just wanted to check the context for this.
Other than that, this is a meaningless post I believe because Vance's job is to do tie breaking, and so far we haven't see anything that tied 50-50. Someone usually abstains making one side or both sides less than 50.
I believe if a bill reaches 50-50 and gets tied, Trump doesn't need to send Vance anywhere. Vance will do his job on his own.
He needs to actually be present for the vote, though.
Awhile back on GAW there were some posts about how the VP should theoretically be able to run the Senate. I looked it up then. The post is random, but I figured the topic was just doing the rounds again.
The post came across as some kind of news must have come out that Trump is not sending / stopping Vance, so just wanted to check the context for this.
Other than that, this is a meaningless post I believe because Vance's job is to do tie breaking, and so far we haven't see anything that tied 50-50. Someone usually abstains making one side or both sides less than 50.
I believe if a bill reaches 50-50 and gets tied, Trump doesn't need to send Vance anywhere. Vance will do his job on his own.
He needs to actually be present for the vote, though.
Awhile back on GAW there were some posts about how the VP should theoretically be able to run the Senate. I looked it up then. The post is random, but I figured the topic was just doing the rounds again.
Yeah usually they already know when a vote will be 50-50 and then VP can be present for that session